|
News: Abercrombie & Fitch CEO: Fatties cant wear our ****
Member Since: 10/12/2002
Posts: 21,317
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BambiStar
But HEW actually still shops there? Abercrombie, American Eagle, Hollister, Aeropostale all have their basic-ass mall brand names plastered all over their clothing. Tbh I find it tacky. Go shop at H&M or something at least! Sheesh.
|
Exactly, they're tacky..
The people that wear their clothes aren't "cool", they're try hard..
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/1/2012
Posts: 8,021
|
Considering the fact that he looks like an overstuffed Gary Busey, I don't think he's one to talk...
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 8/31/2012
Posts: 12,510
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/9/2012
Posts: 59,872
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BambiStar
But HEW actually still shops there? Abercrombie, American Eagle, Hollister, Aeropostale all have their basic-ass mall brand names plastered all over their clothing. Tbh I find it tacky. Go shop at H&M or something at least! Sheesh.
|
Now I use all those (except Abercrombie) and H&M but ya'll are hypocrites doing THE MOST. 
I know those name-brand stores have basic tees w/ their name plastered, but H&M is the definition of BASIC! I will buy a plain tee, or something basic like a jean-design tee and those cost literally $20+. I have plain colored tees and each alone cost like $12.95, and they're hoodies, jakcets, etc are basic pattern designs!
Ya'll do the absolute most, and people who brag about wearing that because they are "against popular clothing that's from 2011" are just as annoying.
Was H&M the first to put yellow on a bikini?
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1086691/th...KINI-570.jpg?3
Was H&M first to tie-dye something?
http://sphotos-f.ak.fbcdn.net/hphoto...34163094_n.jpg
No! So ya'll need to stop w/ this "Aero/Hollister/etc is basic and 2011" when H&M is very well basic ass designs, and stuff that was made and thought of before 2011. Again, I shop at both but I can atleast say the name-brand ones try to be witty, doing a plain and tye-dye clothing line is the definition of used/tacky though it is cute at times.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/22/2011
Posts: 26,525
|
They have nice sweatpants.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/18/2011
Posts: 18,295
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ImARudeBoy
Does anyone even shop there anymore?
Who gonna pay 50$ for a plain colored polo with a tiny ass logo? 
|
Ralph Lauren got people Dewing it.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/4/2011
Posts: 29,960
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/2/2011
Posts: 28,055
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Igrt
Ralph Lauren got people Dewing it.
|
And Lacoste charges $100 for the same thing 
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/14/2013
Posts: 7,669
|
Calm down, sis
I just like buying clothes without any brand names on them unless it's like a higher-end brand like Burberry or Lacoste or something. That's why I like H&M because it has basic clothes for pretty cheap and the only place you see the H&M logo in on the tag. But I do have a couple American Eagle polos still kicking around. Do what you want, but I don't want all my clothes saying 'HOLLISTER EST. 1977' across them. Like... sorry 
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/18/2012
Posts: 20,576
|
Exactly. A&F is still cool, people here are just saying that cause their feelings hurt. Anyway I don't really shop at AF, but I love their sweats. And like you said all these stores are the same crap.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/18/2012
Posts: 20,576
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Igrt
Ralph Lauren got people Dewing it.
|
The only people I see wearing polo shirts are ghetto clowns. They made those shirts look tacky as ****.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/9/2012
Posts: 59,872
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BambiStar
Calm down, sis
I just like buying clothes without any brand names on them unless it's like a higher-end brand like Burberry or Lacoste or something. That's why I like H&M because it has basic clothes for pretty cheap and the only place you see the H&M logo in on the tag. But I do have a couple American Eagle polos still kicking around. Do what you want, but I don't want all my clothes saying 'HOLLISTER EST. 1977' across them. Like... sorry 
|
I'm not mad, ATRL seems to think anyone who has a literacy level to type more than 2 sentences is fuming.
But I just think it's dumb to call something basic, but only like clothes that are basic designed.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/14/2013
Posts: 7,669
|
Quote:
Originally posted by iHypeMusic
I'm not mad, ATRL seems to think anyone who has a literacy level to type more than 2 sentences is fuming.
But I just think it's dumb to call something basic, but only like clothes that are basic designed.
|
I like having simple, brandless clothing basics like shirts, polos, shorts, pants, cartigans, etc to incorporate into an outfit with some nicer, higher-end brand clothing. Not everything you wear has to have a logo on it. H&M have some simple designs, but when I said all the mall brand were basic, I was talking about the brands themselves being basic. I used to wear Hollister, Abercrombie, etc a lot when I was a teenager but I'm growing up, I'm in my twenties now. I just don't use them anymore.
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/4/2006
Posts: 37,808
|
That store is just trash, he is making his brand look bad. I don't care if he wants to market attactive people and not market fat people but thing that bothers me about his store is what his definition of "being attractive" being white? having blonde hair? Why won't you hire other good looking models who are not white? White male models are not the only attactive people. Coming from a white male, I can't support something like that. It comes off ignorant.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/18/2011
Posts: 18,295
|
Quote:
Originally posted by CoolestPerson12
The only people I see wearing polo shirts are ghetto clowns. They made those shirts look tacky as ****.
|
Well, down here I've seen black and white people wearing them.Along with north face jackets.
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/4/2006
Posts: 37,808
|
To me, it sounds like just wants market "attractive white people" not attractive people in general. If his policy is all about marketing good lookig people, then hire any attractive person but all I see is white models.
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/31/2010
Posts: 26,257
|
Not his overly plastic potato head looking self talking about looking good.
Honestly, I like some of their clothes, but their way of going about things is pretty scummy.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/3/2010
Posts: 21,098
|
Dead @ you thinking everyone who genuinely doesn't care for their stuff is obese or ugly. You must've skipped over the racist undertones. Even if that weren't the case, I really don't care for their stuff. It's not my style.
Anyway, sis, you're always saying something just to say something.

|
|
|
Member Since: 5/3/2010
Posts: 26,013
|
Who even shops there anymore 
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/3/2010
Posts: 26,013
|
If you are out of high school and you still rep the Abercrombie shirts I feel bad for you son. I'm a junior an I don't even wear that ****. Pacsun >>>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|