Member Since: 9/24/2011
Posts: 3,565
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Beyond Say
So, Your point?
Whitney Houston and Mariah Carey had vocal training too. Does that make them inferior to Kelly Clarkson?
I'm tired of people acting like getting vocal lessons will make you some seasoned pro. Vocal lessons don't make miracles happen.
As for versatility.
Beyonce has proven she can sing Modern R&B, Traditional R&B, Pop, Opera, rock, and even rap. So i'm not really understanding your logic sis.
|
i dont want to explain much further because i know you are bey's biased saying my point would not changed a thing however what i am saying is there is an advantage being trained i know because i sing and i dont take up lessons (however my cousin who struggled singing took up lessons now she can control her voice much better). so there's definitely improvement in singing if you trained! not necessarily moving mountains improvements like what you are saying
from that kelly being just a natural singer is AMAZING what more if she is trained. got it? that's just my point from that view its like comparing who is smarter the one who is schooled and tutored or the one who is naturally intelligent or genius perhaps got it again?
from versatility kelly can sing pop, r&b, country, jazz, big bands, classical name it all watch her AI videos she covered almost all genres and the hardest among the genres to sing especially for a female singer is ROCK
YOU NEED TO HAVE STRONG LUNG POWER AND LITERALLY AN OXYGEN TANK and KELLY NAILS ROCK PERFORMANCE BETTER THAN ANYONE IN THIS GENERATION.
its hard to sing rock!
the thread who is a better belter goes to kelly. she's literally an oxygen tank, the lance armstrong of vocal cords and the lungs she got. that's why she is MORE POWERFUL as a singer.
bey got her style too the randb the riffs and runs the fast and up tempo songs she nailed it! she is a performer. MJ female version
but ON THE TOPIC again Kelly wins handsdown in here like belting and reaching and sustaining high notes
just my point.
|
|
|