Well obviously.
This isn't just about the allegations (which there's no medical evidence of). Kesha signed a contract that she's legally obligated to fulfill. If there's no evidence to support her claims, then she still has to comply with the agreements she made with Kemosabe/Sony in 2005. She has, however, been given the opportunity to record without any direct contact with the alleged, but she's refused. I think the judge has been fair; She's liable to have committed defamation and the ruling could be far worse. At least she doesn't owe anyone millions, which could be the result of failing to comply with the "$11M" contract.
Hope her attornies made note of Sony's proclamations because label officials refused Kesha's permission
to record new material in an effort to press on with her career, insisting the unexpected hiatus could seriously jeopardise her career then later added that other artists have taken hiatus and
made huge comebacks after taking time out of the public eye.
When will Kesha record,
who will she record with, and
will Sony themselves act professionally on behalf of their client?
Personally, I don't think Sony has any good intentions and will not spend a cent on her.