Radiohead is the kind of artist who music publications and rockist fans will praise to the high heavens regardless of their output. It's petty, but I think that's contributed partially to my dislike.
They're not as bad as The Beatles in that retrospect. To me out of the 9 albums they have, 4 of them I would say are 10/10.
Radiohead is the kind of artist who music publications and rockist fans will praise to the high heavens regardless of their output. It's petty, but I think that's contributed partially to my dislike.
I have felt that too. Specially with A Moon Shaped Pool. The album has been a 70/100 for me since the first listen and i was confounded with the rave reviews tbh.
all i want is for one person to just stand up and say.. "ehh.. maybe it was not SO good."
Radiohead is whatever. There are and will continue to be better bands. They haven't innovated musically since... Idek. In Rainbows? Not that that matters but yeah.
Beck & Bjork remain the super 90s alternative royalty.
I dont agree with the idea of Beatles being the best of all time, but i understand it. It was a different time. Expectations were different.
More than anything else, there wasn't already a "Beatles" to be compared with.
I've not spent enough time with Animal Collective, I've only heard Merriweather, Feels, Here Comes The Indian, and Painting With (I think). I don't remember anything from any of them though.
at least he hates Be Here Now like the rest of the known world.
) but I really liked Spirit.