No thank you to Warren. Far too outspoken for a woman in the general, and lowers the discourse with her dialogue. She'd also be p old.
Kaine, eh. He's fabulous on paper but he did nothing to energize ANYONE this go around. His debate performance was also far too eccentric.
Klobuchar would be better for the Supreme Court IMO. We'll see what happens with her national profile over the next four years, but otherwise, there are far more interesting (female) candidates.
Gillibrand's history with shifting positions would hurt her a lot, whether or not there's any base for the criticism. Also probably too conservative and...bland? to energize millennials, but they don't matter all that much anyways.
Harris really intrigues me.
Duckworth I think is a longshot, but that veteran status and strikingly visual status at that ++++
Booker would be great far the debates, he'd rip Trump apart Good name recognition too, I def think he should run.
O'Malley would be great if he could, you know, attract voters. In a field without really heavy hitters like Obama, Warren or Sanders, he would probably be able to do that.
I am LIVID. Republicans were bitching about hillary allegedly sharing classified info on her email server yet trump wants to give his family top security clearance, and I have yet to see any republicans call out the hypocrisy in that or the possible conflict of interest.
Have you ever been hated or discriminated against?
I have; I've been protested and demonstrated against
Picket signs for my wicked rhymes, look at the times
She's known as a progressive, yeah. But... an Obama-progressive, she's obviously 'establishment' too. Bizarrely doesn't like weed legislation though. I assume we'll learn more now she's in the Senate. It's probably a good thing she hasn't been firm on her stances - she doesn't have much baggage and can unite people behind a common platform going forward.
Seems pretty charismatic and a good speaker to me!
I am LIVID. Republicans were bitching about hillary allegedly sharing classified info on her email server yet trump wants to give his family top security clearance, and I have yet to see any republicans call out the hypocrisy in that or the possible conflict of interest.
She's known as a progressive, yeah. But... an Obama-progressive, she's obviously 'establishment' too. Bizarrely doesn't like weed legislation though. I assume we'll learn more now she's in the Senate. It's probably a good thing she hasn't been firm on her stances - she doesn't have much baggage and can unite people behind a common platform going forward.
Seems pretty charismatic and a good speaker to me!
Thats the problem she may have. Obama was a fantastic orator but was an awful President. He lacked balls, tbqh. I hope Kamala is different and im intrigued by what the Dems do cause lord knows they ****ed up with that last Candidate.
Thats the problem she may have. Obama was a fantastic orator but was an awful President. He lacked balls, tbqh. I hope Kamala is different and im intrigued by what the Dems do cause lord knows they ****ed up with that last Candidate.
Maybe they take the Corbyn route?
Kamala is gorgeous though
Obama will go down as one of the best modern president's of all time in my opinion.
why do you feel that he was a bad president and in what way did he lack balls?
It won't be so happy when he starts going after minorities with no place else to go.
Dems in DC better obstruct him
Obstruct how? They have no majority anyWHERE! They are lame ducks for 4 years, scratching their balls at how they could **** up an election so easily. They literally had it in the bag with Bernie but no, neoliberalism must win!!!!111. How'd that work out for them?
You cant filibuster everything! (can you? idk for your silly policies)
Obstruct how? They have no majority anyWHERE! They are lame ducks for 4 years, scratching their balls at how they could **** up an election so easily. They literally had it in the bag with Bernie but no, neoliberalism must win!!!!111. How'd that work out for them?
You cant filibuster everything! (can you? idk for your silly policies)
Well not all republicans are horrible or white nationalists so all it takes is for democrats to vote unanimously against his bills to have a strong chance of stopping them. Otherwise, we're ****ed.
Good name recognition too, I def think he should run.
) type gals getting ready to possibly face an overturn of Roe v. Wade.
