On par with TD's current sales with only 1 #1 and one flop.
[COLOR="Blue"]
Seriously, stop. You're trolling now. Because what youre doing and the comments that are being elicited is going to make me go in. I dont want warning points. Please quit.[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Blue"]
Seriously, stop. You're trolling now. Because what youre doing and the comments that are being elicited is going to make me go in. I dont want warning points. Please quit.[/COLOR]
The song that "deserves" the #1 is the song that got the most points in that given week, you're trying to apply some sort of subjective standard to something that's clearly objective.
There's never going to be two songs that had the exact same promo or exact same circumstances with regard to their exposure. There's a reason why Billboard doesn't give out the "best effort under limiting circumstances" award every week -- the points you get are the points you get.
Is being an established artist an "unfair" advantage? Their songs are a lot more likely to shoot to #1 than those from newbies. Should all #1 songs that get heavily promoted come with an asterisk because their label gave a damn?
And this is silly because, as has been described in this thread, some of Rihanna's #1s came from playing the system, too. Repression is an advantage, discounts are an advantage, but they aren't unfair ones because there's nothing to stop other labels from doing the same.
Preach
But you know most of the kids on here will never see things logically.