I agree, but the Max Martin-produced singles gave the album a pop reputation, so I just called it pop because that's what it's widely-thought to be (although it's not really true).
IDK who they are really but I found this for you:
Luke: 16th of July 1996
Michael: 20th of November 1995
Calum: 25th of January 1996
Ashton: 7th of July 1994
I agree, but the Max Martin-produced singles gave the album a pop reputation, so I just called it pop because that's what it's widely-thought to be (although it's not really true).
But it sounds like LP5 will be RED minus the non-Max Martin stuff. That's not good.
The album is full of alternative influences (no, I'm not saying it's an alternative album, but it's more on the alternative side of pop than it's on the mainstream one), besides the 3 Max Martin-produced singles, so let's not.
She didn't care about an era rolling. She just wanted her visual album to make a statement.
!
The visual album was that PUNCH heard around the world. It wouldn't have been as much of a hyped event if it had just been the music and no videos. What else would she have to represent the album imagery, pink text on black background? Shame it wasn't sustainable though, it was a groundbreaking marketing strategy
The album is full of alternative influences (no, I'm not saying it's an alternative album, but it's more on the alternative side of pop than it's on the mainstream one), besides the 3 Max Martin-produced singles, so let's not.
It's a pop album.
It's a damn good pop album that was a massive success, but it's still a pop album.
But we need to stop treating "pop" like it's a bad word (even though most pop albums have sucked the past few years).
deadbanana: