Quote:
Originally posted by iHype.
IFPI, Billboard, Official Charts, literally the entire industry doesn't count VEVO views into album equivalents. If the whole entire industry doesn't... it's safe to say they don't count.
Death @ you trying to include VEVO views as sales equivalents though!
The purpose of sales equivalent is to measure how much would be the equivalent of a sale. 1,500 VEVO views do not pay anywhere near the revenue of 1 album sale, hence why they aren't included. You'd need to find a proper formula for VEVO to count as SEA, and it wouldn't be 1,500. You're using an incorrect number.
Death @ you actually being the one 'not testing your own formula' tho.
This whole part being wrong math. 
|
I put the wrong year. 2005 was when HG smashed. The math is right (though I used just its U.S. numbers for the year).
Let's think about this: BOMT supposedly sold 7.5M WW in 1999. There were 438.8M singles sold that year globally. In 2012, there were 2,297M singles sold. That means it would have a "multiplier" of 5.2347...

If we multiplied its sales by that, then we can assume
"...Baby One More Time" would have sold 39,260,483 in 2012 alone
You're literally just flipping the disparity.

Quote:
Originally posted by slobro
Digital Track Sales (in millions)
2012: 1.336 billion (3.78x as big)
2005: 353 million
Hollaback Girl sold 1.2 million in 2005, adjusted to 2012 that would be 4.54 million, that's perfectly reasonable
Obviously this wouldn't work with physical CD singles when most big hits didn't even get a single release, making the physical singles market artificially low. Cute how you left that out, tho 
|
...You do know digital track sales were 2,297M in 2012 according to IFPI, right?
https://www.ukmix.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=107103&f=5
"Hollaback Girl" would be over 15M single sales WW if we bothered to adjust all of its sales
If it doesn't work for singles, how does it magically work for albums? Because that benefits Lady Gaga? Aren't their fewer albums being released, especially fewer albums with significant sales? I mean, aren't catalog sales set to surpass new album sales for the first time ever?

I don't see you bothering to take in to account volume when "adjusting" album sales.