[Chucko]

Originally posted by RatedG²

Well the man talking about Fiorina was clearly joking. Hence the reaction. I don't approve of her reaction though it's a little classless

The man calling Obama a Muslim is rooted within a hate for blacks and a hate for Muslims in this country and should have been addressed right on the spot like John McCain did in 2008

The man that called Obama a Muslim to Trump said nothing about blacks.

Obama isn't running for President, could Trump had said something? Sure. Did he laugh at the guy? No he blew him off. Should Hillary, champion of women, have said something, joke or not? Yes.

This isn't really even about Hillary's reaction to me, it's about the media and their reaction.

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by rivers

You sound like one of those guys who say " if women want equal rights, can we hit them now?"

Of course not. But kudos to Firorina for making it clear it was not a sexist attack when CNN tried to get her to say it.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by Chucko

The man that called Obama a Muslim to Trump said nothing about blacks.

Obama isn't running for President, could Trump had said something? Sure. Did he laugh at the guy? No he blew him off. Should Hillary, champion of women, have said something, joke or not? Yes.

This isn't really even about Hillary's reaction to me, it's about the media and their reaction.

True, that man said nothing about blacks in general but if Obama wasn't black then questions of that caliber wouldn't even be asked. You may not agree with me there though

I agree with you, she should have said something. However not because the remark was sexist or anything (it wasn't) but it was a little awkward laughing at violence if you are a presidential candidate.

The media's reaction was justified in Trump's case and a little soft on Clinton's case. But after the months of email scrutiny, people making fun of her laugh, etc I'm not too bothered that they are finally giving her a break

[RihsusChrist(ATG)]

Originally posted by Javan

And old people also tend to be out of touch with current affairs


We have no way of knowing. Though there is no reason to believe they wouldn't

So?

This kumbaya mantra would sound nice in a Michael Jackson song or Karate Kid movie but in this thread? You gotta give it a rest

Post things that actually have meaning, not this cryptic fortune cookie mumbo jumbo.
As far as U.S. history goes, people groups have always gained power and fought their oppressors by the mean of violence.
The Civil Rights Act was written consequent to a violent riot.
Some could argue had it not been for the Baltimore riots, their wouldn't have been a indictment.
But more to the point why do you keep bringing up riots and looting as if it's a weekly phenomenon? You're gonna need a better backbone to your argument

I'm not getting into a discussion on what you think old people know or don't know about current events...I could be a SJW and call you out for ageism, but whatever.

I highly doubt if the US government bought vast amounts of land in Kenya, and Ethiopia people would move there...what, to get mauled by a lion, or get some incurable disease or killed by terrorists that would lop their head off for being a Christian? That sounds like so enticing to me. Like people are gonna give up Wal-Mart, McDonalds, and Starbucks for that!

So basically you wanna arm a militia, and have violent acts against the police and civilian population? See how far that advances your cause...the military will step in n' snuff that s*** out in a hot minute if it gets out of control.

No hun, the civil rights act was written to get a big block of voters, and what can we do to keep them as voters...those communities gotta pull themselves up, and quit expecting the government to solve all their problems. In the end, the individual is responsible for their actions, and their destiny. People can choose to be lemmings if they want too, but all they are gonna contiune to do is remain poor and miserable.

Originally posted by Damien M

RihsusChrist (tf kinda username is that) should just stop posting now. It's actually becoming offensive.

What's with the personal attack? Your username is nothing to sneeze at either...

I haven't attacked anyone on here personally. I'm just having a discussion...what 'pray tell' have I said that was so offensive?

[that G.U.Y.]

People booing at Trump the last debate. Poor daddy. they are tiredT of his antics.

[RatedG²]

Wow @ all of the conservative media riding on Rubio's dick

[that G.U.Y.]

Tbh Marco Rubio is probably the best response to Hillary the GOP has. He is young, handsome, and passionate.

It would be like JFK versus Nixon tbh

[Javan]

Originally posted by RihsusChrist(ATG)

I highly doubt if the US government bought vast amounts of land in Kenya, and Ethiopia people would move there...what, to get mauled by a lion, or get some incurable disease or killed by terrorists that would lop their head off for being a Christian?

- Who said anything about Kenya and Ethiopia? [/quote]
- Lions? Really?
- There were plenty diseases and epidemics black had to endure in America anyway? Polio? Spanish Flu anyone? Another moot point.
- Killed by terrorists? So what were the KKK?

Originally posted by RihsusChrist(ATG)

So basically you wanna arm a militia, and have violent acts against the police and civilian population?

Basically, I said nothing of the sort. Where are you getting this from?

Originally posted by RihsusChrist(ATG)

No hun, the civil rights act was written to get a big block of voters, and what can we do to keep them as voters...

Highly improbable seeing as the controversial law led to them losing the largest southern states...

[Giselle]

Rihsus, you sound really.... not OK.

[Chucko]

Everyone saying Marco is scripted, they all are, on both sides, except probably Trump. It's debate prep.

I look at who thinks quickly on their feet and can take what they hear at the debate and use it to their advantage. The people that can do that on the Republican side are doing well in the debates. They have little time to get their message out so they have to condense it.

I think Ted, Marco, Carly and Chris are the best at doing this.

[Wafflecakes]

Originally posted by Chucko

A man "jokes" about choking out Carly at a Hillary event yesterday and Hillary cackles about it, media defends her, a guy says Obama is a Muslim to Trump media goes nuts.

What a moronic false equivalency.

Joking about choking someone is bad, but I and many others say stuff like that all the time when I am frustrated about someone. It is a part of the English language at this point.

It is not nearly as serious as painting a religion as evil then falsely apply that to a candidate you don't like.

[that G.U.Y.]

Originally posted by Chucko

Everyone saying Marco is scripted, they all are, on both sides, except probably Trump. It's debate prep.

I look at who thinks quickly on their feet and can take what they hear at the debate and use it to their advantage. The people that can do that on the Republican side are doing well in the debates. They have little time to get their message out so they have to condense it.

I think Ted, Marco, Carly and Chris are the best at doing this.

Only Rand Paul does this well tho

[Chucko]

Originally posted by Wafflecakes

What a moronic false equivalency.

Joking about choking someone is bad, but I and many others say stuff like that all the time when I am frustrated about someone. It is a part of the English language at this point.

It is not nearly as serious as painting a religion as evil then falsely apply that to a candidate you don't like.

I never go around saying I'm going to choke someone, maybe you need to grow up. Keep defending Hillary though.

[Chucko]

Originally posted by that G.U.Y.

Only Rand Paul does this well tho

I don't think so, Marco had a great point last night about deductions. We can't deduct the cost for the most important resource of our country, our children. Rand says it's not a Conservative view point, I say he is dead wrong. Nothing is more important to the success, security and future of our country than our kids.

Now how we pay for it is another story, Marco might want to go tweak some numbers and come up with a more comprehensive plan on how this is going to not cost us a ton of money but does anyone here think it's a bad idea?

[RihsusChrist(ATG)]

Originally posted by Giselle

Rihsus, you sound really.... not OK.

Oh I'm fine Giselle, but it's nice that you care about me so much.
I just get a kick out of pushing people's buttons, the psychology undergrad in me!

Javan defended his position really well, he didn't get angry or throw insults...unlike Damien M. who would be better served to articulate his positions, instead of throwing petty insults. That's childish, imo.

[RihsusChrist(ATG)]

Originally posted by Chucko

I never go around saying I'm going to choke someone, maybe you need to grow up. Keep defending Hillary though.

If Carly laughed about someone saying they wanted to strangle Hillary there wouldn't be a rock large enough for Carly to hide under from the scorn of the liberal media.

[Citrus]

Y'all a mess.

[Javan]

Dd. I just watched the choke Carly video and yall really getting upset over that? how bout you get upset over her GOP opponents talking down to her in debates; " why is she speak when I am speaking?!" Basically a kind way of saying, "know your place woman".

[that G.U.Y.]

Carly lost so many peoples jobs and ruined peoples retirement funds. There are many people who want to hurt her. Just facts.

[King Maxx]

Hillary started laughing even b4 he said the choking part.