I don't know why you guys act so mad at this. It's disrespectful yes, but everytime someone dies, there is this speculation on what was the cause exactly or the "true cause". If this article claimed he died from anything else other than the 'true story' we believe in, like a cancer, I doubt yall would be "oh so disrespectful". You all are overreacting and thinking is offensive just because they're saying it is aids.
I don't know why you guys act so mad at this. It's disrespectful yes, but everytime someone dies, there is this speculation on what was the cause exactly. If this article claimed he died from anything else other than the 'true story' we believe in, like a cancer, I doubt you would all be "oh so disrespectful". You all are overreacting and thinking is offensive just because they're saying it is aids.
Its disrespectful because of the source, and the transparency of the OP.
I don't know why you guys act so mad at this. It's disrespectful yes, but everytime someone dies, there is this speculation on what was the cause exactly or the "true cause". If this article claimed he died from anything else other than the 'true story' we believe in, like a cancer, I doubt yall would be "oh so disrespectful". You all are overreacting and thinking is offensive just because they're saying it is aids.
Its disrespectful because of the source, and the transparency of the OP.
Many things we disbelieved in the very first time have turned out to be true before. It wouldn't be the first time. Lets just wait and see how this ends
Many things we disbelieved in the very first time have turned out to be true before. It wouldn't be the first time. Lets just wait and see how this ends
This is messy because the last time the NE said somebody has hiv they were right but i'm sure they're banking on that to give this some kind of credibility