Yes, use a statement from the article at hand to prove that they have cited his lack of sales in other articles. Great point!
Because I was only talking about them constantly saying it in THIS article. Show me where I said they said so in other articles.
Quote:
Well, conveniently placing a time frame of 40 days on derogatory posts can make anyone look like a fan I do not have the patience or time to look through your posts just so you can weasel your way out of it by categorizing it under sarcasm/satire.
"when you seem to be at the forefront of every thread related to Beyoncé's achievements."
If I'm at the forefront of every thread related to Beyonce's achievement, you could EASILY pull an example, correct? You wouldn't have to reach for things said months ago, because in reality you have me confused with someone else.
Quote:
I never stated that goes into voting, it's just another form of proof that the majority of the industry was truly shocked by Beyoncé in more ways than one, the voters within the academy do not possess some sort of superior skill that identifies "quality music". His win was B.S & you know it.
"His win was B.S & you know it. "
So you said GRAMMYs holds the same validity as any other publication / critic, yet called his win BS? At the end of the day as said by YOU, their opinion is just as the next higher up opinion. You not liking it because it's different ≠ B.S.
I mean one trip to the website...
Best performances - picture of beyonce
Biggest grammy upsets - Belittles beck and praises beyonce
Best and worst grammy moments - belittles beck and praises beyonce
grammy pictures - drags on beyonce snub conversation again
+ the article in the op.
I mean one trip to the website...
Best performances - picture of beyonce
Biggest grammy upsets - Belittles beck and praises beyonce
Best and worst grammy moments - belittles beck and praises beyonce
grammy pictures - drags on beyonce snub conversation again
+ the article in the op.
can they be more transparent
!!!!
This not new. They have been posting irrelevant beyonce articles for months. EVERY DAY
NOT Billboard showing it's true face after that mess yesterday. It's not professional for a magazine that holds value like bb to be so sided like this. First of all, they should support the artists, whether they sell millions or only thousands of albums.
Pretty disrespectful and disappointing. Get your **** together, Billboard.
Because I was only talking about them constantly saying it in THIS article. Show me where I said they said so in other articles.
Let me dumb this down for you real quick:
You said "Why does Billboard keep shading him saying he's undeserving of winning because his sales." which in turn implies that Billboard had done this before (which to my knowledge is hasn't) & so I said: "They've only pinpointed his lack of sales in this article" which then you replied to by quoting them highlighting his lack of sales in the exact same article we're discussing in this thread. Do you see where I'm going here?
Quote:
"when you seem to be at the forefront of every thread related to Beyoncé's achievements."
If I'm at the forefront of every thread related to Beyonce's achievement, you could EASILY pull an example, correct? You wouldn't have to reach for things said months ago, because in reality you have me confused with someone else.
This is a thread discussing her album which was released in 2013. Not even her stans were talking about it in 2015.
Quote:
"His win was B.S & you know it. "
So you said GRAMMYs holds the same validity as any other publication / critic, yet called his win BS? At the end of the day as said by YOU, their opinion is just as the next higher up opinion. You not liking it because it's different ≠ B.S.
Anything else you have to say?
I'm sorry where did I compare the GRAMMYs validity to any other publication? You're grasping for straws here. Do not @ me unless you have something of value to add to the conversation (which judging by your previous posts in this thread would suggest you log out & call it a day).
You said "Why does Billboard keep shading him saying he's undeserving of winning because his sales." which in turn implies that Billboard had done this before (which to my knowledge is hasn't) & so I said: "They've only pinpointed his lack of sales in this article" which then you replied to by quoting them highlighting his lack of sales in the exact same article we're discussing in this thread. Do you see where I'm going here?
No need to dumb down WHAT I SAID. The absolute nerve.
EYE was referring to THIS article, and no others. Sorry you misinterpreted and look a mess.
Quote:
This is a thread discussing her album which was released in 2013. Not even her stans were talking about it in 2015.
But you weren't talking about this thread. You were talking about me running in other threads regarding her achievements, not even the album. So yes, again, show proof if you have it.
Quote:
I'm sorry where did I compare the GRAMMYs validity to any other publication? You're grasping for straws here. Do not @ me unless you have something of value to add to the conversation (which judging by your previous posts in this thread would suggest you log out & call it a day).
At least, it's not the lowest-selling of all time. And considering his music is the least commercial out of all AOTY winners in the last few years, that's understandable.
This might be an award for his overall legacy, and less an award for Morning Phase on its own merits.
Billboard spilling the tea. Everyone knows it was Bey's award. Beck just got lucky he made another good record that he could get some recognition for. Bey's time will come as well.
I mean one trip to the website...
Best performances - picture of beyonce
Biggest grammy upsets - Belittles beck and praises beyonce
Best and worst grammy moments - belittles beck and praises beyonce
grammy pictures - drags on beyonce snub conversation again
+ the article in the op.