Because her image is ATRL friendly. She's edgy, leather clad, and fierce (It's what 80% of popstars are, so it's generic in a way) so she clicks well with ATRLers.
This is a good point.
ATRL will never face the facts about how generic a lot of Rihanna's music is because of her image. She's the cool, edgy girl. She can't be generic to them.
Diamonds did receive some criticism and so did Take a Bow and the others. Not so much criticism, but they were compared to other songs released during those times.
The reason Rihanna isn't "criticised" is because she's always one of the first ones to do something trendy. So it's still fresh and new when she does it. And honestly, her songs always have that Rihanna touch, because of her vocals.
Because her image is ATRL friendly. She's edgy, leather clad, and fierce (It's what 80% of popstars are, so it's generic in a way) so she clicks well with ATRLers.
The first time I agree with you
Quote:
Originally posted by Artemisia
This is a good point.
ATRL will never face the facts about how generic a lot of Rihanna's music is because of her image. She's the cool, edgy girl. She can't be generic to them.
Exactly she's not different and people give her the music so I don't know why navy are bragging when it's not her music in the first place.
There are no big and small Grammys. You either win a Grammy or you don't. There is no hierarchy. Some girls can't get ANY Grammies, FYI.
Are you saying that winning the Urban Contemporary grammy is the same or, at the very least, on par with winning Album of the Year/Record of the Year/Song of the Year?
Are you saying that winning the Urban Contemporary grammy is the same or, at the very least, on par with winning Album of the Year/Record of the Year/Song of the Year?
Because she uses a wide palette of producers and always trying something new.
While others like Taylor/Perry/Kesha/Clarckson/Pink always uses the same unoriginal producers.