The answer is right on the first page.
Check how many people invented the term "features artist" to describe someone whose top song is currently a duet
. A duet =/= a feature.They're
distinctly different. There is simply no rational argument an intelligent human being can make to discredit her involvement in the success of the track. Billboard even knows you'd be too handicapped to figure these fine details out and tries to spell it out for the more analytically handicapped... but somehow certain ATRLers just know better.
Pay close attention to how many parrots are chirping the same thing. It's very interesting. It's like if they chant the same thing enough times it'll magically become true. I love watching the ATRL hive mind, they should be studied by anthropologists.
ATRL doesn't give Christina credit because they can't entirely figure out what that would entail. They've just decided she can't be considered highly successful and will literally risk sounding like a delusional moron to fit in with their stan group.
ATRL LOGIC: excellent, wildly successful collaboration decisions + "the voice" on the hit show The Voice + drowning in accolades as of late + two underperforming eras (still better than this year) + very, very successful past + often referred to as a legend = an overrated artist who doesn't deserve much credit.
Ignorant people somehow threatened by Christina's success, as if it's going to suddenly discredit the success of their fave. ATRL just has a self-esteem problem.