It's ****ing powerful.
This has the potential to reach the level of iconicness of Janet's RS cover.
No for a few reasons. One being that magazines don't hold the same power in society as they did when Janet comes out. Two being that this cover isn't really that original or interesting. We've seen pop stars with snakes on before. We've seen depictions of Medusa. We've seen Rihanna with creepy contacts. Janet's really stood out.
I know who Medusa is, I actually forgot who she was, I learned about her in college, but still, I think she should of done it differently. It looks tacky.
I know who Medusa is, I actually forgot who she was, I learned about her in college, but still, I think she should of done it differently. It looks tacky.
I agree that the snakes on her head seem a bit off but I wouldn't use "tacky" to describe it.
Mess. Isn't GQ cover supposed to be just pretty and sexy in order to attract male buyers? This issue just WON'T sell. It's so scary, try hard and not hot at all.