Quote:
Originally posted by dperkins
What are you talking about? I brought the iconic performance up in my 2nd post. It was debated by you and others that it was not. So i dont see how its a different discussion. It pertains to the topic at hand. Yet I bring you youtube views and journalists opinions and you toss them aside and create excuses for why they're "insufficient". You're the who's coming off insecure when you deny fact after fact like living in your own delusional world is somehow gonna change it. Even if Christina is more iconic than Pink, which I think they're closer than most wanna admit, it doesn't change the fact that Pink has the more iconic Grammy performance. Is Christina's up there too? It seems to be. I thought it was awful, but that's my opinion.
|
Excuses? All I'm saying is that I was talking specifically and only about how there' s a difference in Youtube views from 2007 to 2010 in that response and then you randomly brought up critical reception to that performance, which I wasn't even talking about at all.
But if you really want to go there, Christina's performance was listed at #3 on The Greatest Grammy Performances of All Time by the Grammys themselves, not some external journalist source. If you were really were a stan like you said you were, then you should know this. But then again, maybe you do, and you're omitting that to make Pink look good. Who knows.
And if there's anyone being delusional here, it's you, thinking that Pink is recognized as some hugely iconic artist when she's not. And I don't think you're even that delusional. At least I would hope not.
I think you know if you're being honest to yourself, that she does not get that much attention in this kind of thing. I can empathize with you thinking she deserves more credit, but what you think she deserves and what the reality is are two different things.