The site's (and the world to be fair) plagued with the kind of people that will say 1 billion times that his music is horrible but if for example Never Close Our Eyes ever became a hit you will see a bunch of boring threads about the achievements of that song and "Which song is better NCOE or..?" Take for example Somebody that I Used To Know or We Are Young. Bring any of these tracks here without them being hits and you will see them torn apart to shreds. They stan for fame not for quality.
This is some ignorant ****ery. Why should Adam have to change who he is to please a bunch of self-loathing hypocrites who think he "gives them a bad name"?
Self hating? You must actually believe that stereotype. . I never said he should change who he is. He should be more understanding.
His music is bad IMO, and I don't like his image. That's all.
I enjoy a lot of gay males acts, like Elton John, Mika, Freddie Mercury (Queen), Scissor Sisters and a few George Michael songs. He should think if HE is the problem, not us.
I don't see why the gay community wouldn't want to support the first openly gay artist signed to a major label. A win for Adam is a win for the entire LGBT community. It needs to be established that an openly gay artist can sell well and be successful in the music industry, and it's going to be nearly impossible for Adam to do so if they gays don't pull their heads out of their self-loathing asses and support him.
Self hating? You must actually believe that stereotype. . I never said he should change who he is. He should be more understanding.
If you're a gay person who dislikes another gay person's image because you think them being feminine "gives you a bad name", the problem lies with you, not with them.
I mean Ricky Martin is successful but in this case, he wears normal clothes and don't wear outfits made for Lady Gaga. That's the main problem with Adam, his music ain't bad but the way he acts and wears stops gay ppl from buying her music.