Quote:
Originally posted by Haus
What the hell are you talking about? This is a common sense move to reduce paper waste. Her music career has nothing to do with it.
Using paper to create ART that will be appreciated =/= using paper to be torn apart and thrown away (most wrapping paper can't even be recycled).
|
It's the hypocritical statements she's making about how other people use paper products, when Grimes as a art project itself has a lot of paper waste.
Let's say that for sake of argument Grimes has sold 400,000 physical records WW. CDs and Vinyl. Imagine the paper waste from that? It's not like she didn't have the option to just release them digitally, she did.
She didn't have to include drawings with the deluxe editions and waste paper there.
What I'm arguing is why should we draw the line at somebody getting away with paper waste just because it's 'art'?
And I'm not against physical copies of music. I buy them too. I'm just making the argument that Grimes should maybe analyze her own wastefulness before coming for everyone else.