Quote:
Originally posted by MrDeeds
It wont work, at all, but it's hilarious.
You keep going for personal attacks when you're out of arguments.
|
I'd like to know where you're deducing this from?
I posted a counterargument to the belief that Jill's own votes are the only relevant factor when discussing her impact.
How does one provide a counterargument to this hyperbolic mess of a post?
"If by qualified you mean 30+ years of corruption, then damn right you are." - Hyperbole
"For the fourth time, your math is elementary. They preferred Trump over Clinton or would've stayed home." - Hyperbole
"She will only go down in history as the power-hungry crooked, bitter spouse who wanted felt she had something to prove and lost to an unknown Black man with a Muslim name and an inexperienced celebrity and had multiple FBI investigations for the dead bodies she accumulated and lies she told to the American people. - Hyperbole
---
Also stating that opinions are stupid are not personal attacks. Your opinions can be stupid. The ones in that post were particularly idiotic.