I mean I know they can I just think it's unnecessary.
I actually do support that but straights can get accidentally pregnant where as gay couples cannot.
xox
So basically you think that all planned pregnancies are unnecessary.
It's unnecessary, I mean if you want to treat a child like a designer baby specified to your wants (looks, genetics etc.) that's up to you but I don't think it's right.
xox
I'm sorry but I think this is just a ridiculous and close-minded view and the term designer baby is not ok
It's unnecessary, I mean if you want to treat a child like a designer baby specified to your wants (looks, genetics etc.) that's up to you but I don't think it's right.
Yes, gay people should be allowed to use surrogacy if they want to, adoption may not be suitable for all gay couples though and what if they want a biological child? I think it's a bit rude to limit that option to straight and infertile people and why do you believe that adoption should be the only options for straight and gay people?
I think gay people deserve the right to choose how they want to have children.
If a gay couple want a biological link to a child I don't think it's right to deny them that. Plus adoption is definitely not as easy a process as people make it out to be (and is even more difficult for gay couples with the discrimination they face when trying to).
All options available to all humans with an IQ of above ??? points (and participated in a parenting course and psychological evaluations tbh, just like gays who wants to adopt)
1) Designer baby? This is ridiculous, the same thing goes for every pregnancy terminated because of a genetic disease etc. Rather than that nothing else is ''designed''.
2) If your problem is that many children have no parents so why make new babies when there are many left alone already, then you are suggesting that people should stop making babies until all these babies find families lol. I get that's it's heartbreaking that all these babies have no parents but if a couple wants to have a baby with ''their DNA'' it's totally understandable.