Quote:
Originally posted by itsJAMESbitch
they are. especially if she's supposed to be "the queen". she didn't even do 300k. it's bad.
the "no promo" thing is used when she does good and when she doesn't. it's just excuses. Britney stans were happy she was doing promotion this era and now that the numbers are in she had "flop promo".....ok
|
I may receieve points, but it's not intended to be hateful. But she's doing 279k in March, with one underperforming single & one that has not been fully implanted in buyers head. The promotion was done within just 2 days before the album's release. You can't tell me that was a masterpiece for huge breakout numbers. 279k is more than a lot of the past albums released, it's also nearly as much as some albums that had a few huge hits and a lot of promo leading up to the release. Released during busier times at that. We won't drop names for those easily irritated.
Britney stans have also not been happy about the promotion this era until it was FINALLY announced there would be any.. a week before release. So in all technicality, the promo has been weak. The singles have not done that amazing part in due to lack of promotion, delayed video released, and bad timing.
There's nothing about these sales to bash considering all of the circumstances. Not excuses. Even if you want to call them that, they are all able to be validated.