[Gifted]

Originally posted by Prismatic

What's the classic?

Stomped here too

[shelven]

This actually looks like a lot of fun!

[alexanderao]

1st: wesleywalrus - 175 points - 10:22pm
2nd: Prismatic - 100 points - 10:26pm
3rd: Amaloner - 50 points - 10:26pm

[Prismy]

Am I out?

[Gifted]

**** you, John Lennon!

[alexanderao]

wesley clinches! Congrats!

[alexanderao]

Contemplating options right now.

[alexanderao]

If I make it so that only Prismatic and Amaloner can participate in R60, and leave the scoring system the same, Prismatic is mathematically eliminated.

But if I make it so that more people can participate, then Prismatic is not mathematically eliminated (because Amaloner isn't guaranteed the 100 points he'd basically have automatically with a 2-person round).

Or, I could make it a 2-person round and change the scoring system so that Prismatic has a chance to win a playoff spot, but I said before these last 10 rounds that I wanted to keep the same scoring system throughout.

[wesleywalrus]

Poor yall

[alexanderao]

Originally posted by alexanderao

If I make it so that only Prismatic and Amaloner can participate in R60, and leave the scoring system the same, Prismatic is mathematically eliminated.

But if I make it so that more people can participate, then Prismatic is not mathematically eliminated (because Amaloner isn't guaranteed the 100 points he'd basically have automatically with a 2-person round).

Or, I could make it a 2-person round and change the scoring system so that Prismatic has a chance to win a playoff spot, but I said before these last 10 rounds that I wanted to keep the same scoring system throughout.

Would like some objective input on this.

[Element]

You could do a winner takes all points?

[alexanderao]

Originally posted by Element

You could do a winner takes all points?

I could, but not sure if it's very fair to negate Amaloner's lead.

[alexanderao]

It's also easy to make the playoffs have 8 people instead of 7, but that goes against what I've said for most of the game.

[Kavish]

It's okay to break your words. Vows are spoken to be broken. Words are meaningless and forgettable. Words are very unnecessary, they can only do harm.

[shelven]

Originally posted by alexanderao

Or, I could make it a 2-person round and change the scoring system so that Prismatic has a chance to win a playoff spot, but I said before these last 10 rounds that I wanted to keep the same scoring system throughout.

Originally posted by alexanderao

It's also easy to make the playoffs have 8 people instead of 7, but that goes against what I've said for most of the game.

Do one of these.

[Element]

I think you should have 8 people in the playoffs. It's always nice to have a surprise twist like that. Not sticking to your words would be bad in a case where you suddenly changed it to 6, in my opinion.

[Bloomers]

Why not make the next round one in which only the winner of the round receives points? Either that or have a finale with 8 players.

Both seem pretty fair as an impartial eliminated player watching from the sidelines. It might be nice to have 8 players if it's not too much work since everybody has been more or less dedicated.

[alexanderao]

Originally posted by Bloomers

Why not make the next round only one place? Where only the winner of the round receives points?

That ignores Amaloner's lead heading into the round, which seems rather unfair.

Leaning towards 8-person playoffs atm.

[shelven]

Originally posted by alexanderao

That ignores Amaloner's lead heading into the round, which seems rather unfair.

Leaning towards 8-person playoffs atm.

So would there just not be a Round 60 then?

[alexanderao]

Originally posted by shelven

So would there just not be a Round 60 then?

Well, I was thinking that I could do it as a way for people to try to climb up the leaderboard a bit.