|
New Track: Britney Spears - "Private Show"
Member Since: 11/9/2011
Posts: 10,037
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Patrick
I was surprised to see the mixed reception for this one... and then I wasn't.
Further proof of a deep generational chasm that divides ATRL into two camps; the twentysomething pop sophisticates with 15 to 20 years of top-shelf pop consumption to their name, and an unruly kid crew with Scream Queens avatars and tributes to Nick Jonas in their signatures. It's not that the latter generation is a lost cause entirely, but they've clearly never heard a "Britney" — that is, they've never encountered a voice quite as distinctive as Britney's. "But I know Britney! Circus was the first album I bought!" First off, ask for a refund. And no, you don't know Britney, you know a very stilted and subdued version of the iconic performer.
The Britney of "Private Show" is Britney as Britney is intended to sound. She very skillfully vacillates between a range of tones; she nasally, then guttural, then grainy, then nasally again, then delicate. (And yes, that's how she's supposed to do it.) She's sultry. She's goofy. She's sounds slightly absurd. She's fully engaged. She's expressive in ways that "technically superior" vocalists just aren't. She is brilliant. You have no idea how brilliant she is.
This is the probably purest attempt Britney has made to harness some of that ineffable charm that made her early work so irresistible. I adore it.
|
or..... the vocals are simply horrible and that's all there is to it.
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 12/7/2008
Posts: 87,284
|
The fact that I played this more than Britney Jean's album tracks
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2016
Posts: 2,948
|
#14
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2013
Posts: 19,579
|
I was excited for this but her vocals sound too weird.
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 12/7/2008
Posts: 87,284
|
#14 NOOOWWW
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/28/2012
Posts: 34,863
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Patrick
I was surprised to see the mixed reception for this one... and then I wasn't.
Further proof of a deep generational chasm that divides ATRL into two camps; the twentysomething pop sophisticates with 15 to 20 years of top-shelf pop consumption to their name, and an unruly kid crew with Scream Queens avatars and tributes to Nick Jonas in their signatures. It's not that the latter generation is a lost cause entirely, but they've clearly never heard a "Britney" — that is, they've never encountered a voice quite as distinctive as Britney's. "But I know Britney! Circus was the first album I bought!" First off, ask for a refund. And no, you don't know Britney, you know a very stilted and subdued version of the iconic performer.
The Britney of "Private Show" is Britney as Britney is intended to sound. She very skillfully vacillates between a range of tones; she nasally, then guttural, then grainy, then nasally again, then delicate. (And yes, that's how she's supposed to do it.) She's sultry. She's goofy. She's sounds slightly absurd. She's fully engaged. She's expressive in ways that "technically superior" vocalists just aren't. She is brilliant. You have no idea how brilliant she is.
This is the probably purest attempt Britney has made to harness some of that ineffable charm that made her early work so irresistible. I adore it.
|
The fact that you're probably not trolling
OT: This is horrid.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2011
Posts: 37,346
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ***** of Babylon
or..... the vocals are simply horrible and that's all there is to it.
|
yeah that post is delusional from start to finish.
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 12/7/2008
Posts: 87,284
|
Am I the only one who isnt "SHOCKED" with her vocals here at all?
Seems like half of the posters here are used for processed "Autotune-Cyborg-Britney" vocals I guess.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/12/2011
Posts: 18,018
|
I don't like it, she sounds terrible on this.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2016
Posts: 2,948
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Scotty
How can a fellow britney stan defend this
|
Easily
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/27/2012
Posts: 6,308
|
These are britneys real unedited vocals and i ****ing love them.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2013
Posts: 19,579
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Patrick
I was surprised to see the mixed reception for this one... and then I wasn't.
Further proof of a deep generational chasm that divides ATRL into two camps; the twentysomething pop sophisticates with 15 to 20 years of top-shelf pop consumption to their name, and an unruly kid crew with Scream Queens avatars and tributes to Nick Jonas in their signatures. It's not that the latter generation is a lost cause entirely, but they've clearly never heard a "Britney" — that is, they've never encountered a voice quite as distinctive as Britney's. "But I know Britney! Circus was the first album I bought!" First off, ask for a refund. And no, you don't know Britney, you know a very stilted and subdued version of the iconic performer.
The Britney of "Private Show" is Britney as Britney is intended to sound. She very skillfully vacillates between a range of tones; she nasally, then guttural, then grainy, then nasally again, then delicate. (And yes, that's how she's supposed to do it.) She's sultry. She's goofy. She's sounds slightly absurd. She's fully engaged. She's expressive in ways that "technically superior" vocalists just aren't. She is brilliant. You have no idea how brilliant she is.
This is the probably purest attempt Britney has made to harness some of that ineffable charm that made her early work so irresistible. I adore it.
|
This is so pretentious. Acting like this is some art you only can appreciate if you're in your mid 20s and owned BOMT on cassette, giving me "only 90s kids remember" teas. Plenty of people saying they dislike it know Britney's discography inside out and want some good new stuff from her. This is not it.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/27/2012
Posts: 6,308
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Doogle
This is so pretentious. Acting like this is some art you only can appreciate if you're in your mid 20s and owned BOMT on cassette, giving me "only 90s kids remember" teas. Plenty of people saying they dislike it know Britney's discography inside out and want some good new stuff from her. This is not it.
|
What are you even doing in here? Like?
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/8/2012
Posts: 13,571
|
Living for this!
My bf downloaded it without me even ;prompting him to. Britney her power!
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 12/7/2008
Posts: 87,284
|
ATRL in general not liking it? The GP will love it then
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2013
Posts: 19,579
|
Reacting to a new song by an artist I like.. Do you understand how ATRL works??
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/2/2014
Posts: 72
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Jeiboy
Am I the only one who isnt "SHOCKED" with her vocals here at all?
Seems like half of the posters here are used for processed "Autotune-Cyborg-Britney" vocals I guess.
|
FF and that mixtape kind of brainwashed some of the Army I think
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/12/2011
Posts: 18,018
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Patrick
I was surprised to see the mixed reception for this one... and then I wasn't.
Further proof of a deep generational chasm that divides ATRL into two camps; the twentysomething pop sophisticates with 15 to 20 years of top-shelf pop consumption to their name, and an unruly kid crew with Scream Queens avatars and tributes to Nick Jonas in their signatures. It's not that the latter generation is a lost cause entirely, but they've clearly never heard a "Britney" — that is, they've never encountered a voice quite as distinctive as Britney's. "But I know Britney! Circus was the first album I bought!" First off, ask for a refund. And no, you don't know Britney, you know a very stilted and subdued version of the iconic performer.
The Britney of "Private Show" is Britney as Britney is intended to sound. She very skillfully vacillates between a range of tones; she nasally, then guttural, then grainy, then nasally again, then delicate. (And yes, that's how she's supposed to do it.) She's sultry. She's goofy. She's sounds slightly absurd. She's fully engaged. She's expressive in ways that "technically superior" vocalists just aren't. She is brilliant. You have no idea how brilliant she is.
This is the probably purest attempt Britney has made to harness some of that ineffable charm that made her early work so irresistible. I adore it.
|
I just...
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/27/2011
Posts: 13,026
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Patrick
I was surprised to see the mixed reception for this one... and then I wasn't.
Further proof of a deep generational chasm that divides ATRL into two camps; the twentysomething pop sophisticates with 15 to 20 years of top-shelf pop consumption to their name, and an unruly kid crew with Scream Queens avatars and tributes to Nick Jonas in their signatures. It's not that the latter generation is a lost cause entirely, but they've clearly never heard a "Britney" — that is, they've never encountered a voice quite as distinctive as Britney's. "But I know Britney! Circus was the first album I bought!" First off, ask for a refund. And no, you don't know Britney, you know a very stilted and subdued version of the iconic performer.
The Britney of "Private Show" is Britney as Britney is intended to sound. She very skillfully vacillates between a range of tones; she nasally, then guttural, then grainy, then nasally again, then delicate. (And yes, that's how she's supposed to do it.) She's sultry. She's goofy. She's sounds slightly absurd. She's fully engaged. She's expressive in ways that "technically superior" vocalists just aren't. She is brilliant. You have no idea how brilliant she is.
This is the probably purest attempt Britney has made to harness some of that ineffable charm that made her early work so irresistible. I adore it.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 8,746
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Patrick
I was surprised to see the mixed reception for this one... and then I wasn't.
Further proof of a deep generational chasm that divides ATRL into two camps; the twentysomething pop sophisticates with 15 to 20 years of top-shelf pop consumption to their name, and an unruly kid crew with Scream Queens avatars and tributes to Nick Jonas in their signatures. It's not that the latter generation is a lost cause entirely, but they've clearly never heard a "Britney" — that is, they've never encountered a voice quite as distinctive as Britney's. "But I know Britney! Circus was the first album I bought!" First off, ask for a refund. And no, you don't know Britney, you know a very stilted and subdued version of the iconic performer.
The Britney of "Private Show" is Britney as Britney is intended to sound. She very skillfully vacillates between a range of tones; she nasally, then guttural, then grainy, then nasally again, then delicate. (And yes, that's how she's supposed to do it.) She's sultry. She's goofy. She's sounds slightly absurd. She's fully engaged. She's expressive in ways that "technically superior" vocalists just aren't. She is brilliant. You have no idea how brilliant she is.
This is the probably purest attempt Britney has made to harness some of that ineffable charm that made her early work so irresistible. I adore it.
|
|
|
|
|
|