Quote:
Originally posted by Meowster
The Moderators were childish and promised an economical debate and immediately started the debate asking if Donald Trump was a clown and then gave Kasich the medium to trash the clowns. But the actual questions Ted Cruz and Rubio called them out on (especially Cruz) were actually great questions that they didn't want to answer. Not to mention that a moderator should have been able to catch Trump in a lie right then and there, not waiting for commercial break to go back at it.
Now calling CNBC liberal-leaning is the biggest load of **** I've ever heard in my entire life and they were definitely wrong about that. But the moderators couldn't contain anyone and the whole show just looked very cheap. They deserve scrutiny.
|
The moderators were Liberal, there is no way the 3 of those main moderators are voting in a Republican primary. It does not matter if the network as a whole is balanced.
Winners were Marco, then toss up between Chis and Carly imo, leaning slightly more to Chris but the big losers are Bush, Huck and Paul. Everyone else held their ground. Rand and Mike should do the Republicans a favor and drop out before the next debate so more time can be spent on the the others.
Bush has to much money, he won't drop out but he will be blocked by Marco unless he totally implodes and I don't see that happening. I'm looking at a Marco/Carly or Marco/Kasich ticket.
Interesting observation I have made over the past few debates is Trump and Carson been buddy buddy, I would not put it past Trump to pick Carson as his VP.
