the owner posted a picture of the dress (posted a few pages back) and she confirmed that the dress is blue and black irl
okay...but what if she never posted that picture???
if I'm going by the picture i first saw...i will say its white and gold because although it has a blue hint...i'm viewing the picture the same way i'm seeing the picture of the wedding and lawn tables
it's like getting a picture of a cup half filled with juice and someones asks if it's half full or half empty...if it was poured then it's half full...if someone was drinking out of it, then half empty..
but how are we suppose to know that just by looking at the picture???
it's like getting a picture of a cup half filled with juice and someones asks if it's half full or half empty...if it was poured then it's half full...if someone was drinking out of it, then half empty...of course there is only one answer but it's all about perception
Why are you still talking about the color of the original dress? It is about that one picture and how so many people are seeing the gold stripes as BLACK. The white is arguable because it IS tinted blue. But BLACK? Are you kidding me? How can you tell it is BLACK from that photo without knowing the original color? Even the photoshop palette tells it is gold on that pic.
I didn't deny that the dress in reality may be black and blue. My argument is, due to whatever factors or camera tricks, they made it appear different colors OTHER than black or blue - now what different colors you see is another debate. (although I know you're keen on saying it's blue instead of white).
But you're arguing that it's white in that photo-- even though it's not literally white since we have a smooth color sample of it-- but you say it's white with a shadow on it because you know that white takes on other colors due to shadow, because we've all seen pure WHITE before.
We've seen the actual BLUE color of the dress, so we know that lighting causes it to be a lighter color.
You can't say the original color of the dress doesn't matter-- because if none of us had ever seen pure white before, we wouldn't be able to tell that the white-tinged-blue things such as those chairs are actually white with shadows on them.
Why are you still talking about the color of the original dress? It is about that one picture and how so many people are seeing the gold stripes as BLACK. The white is arguable because it IS tinted blue. But BLACK? Are you kidding me? How can you tell it is BLACK from that photo without knowing the original color? Even the photoshop palette tells it is gold on that pic.
The group of girls that started this debate confirmed that they saw the dress in person, so we know it's actually blue.
it confirmed what you were thinking...but at that point in time when the dress was the only photo...it still could have gone either way just by how we want to
i'm used to seeing white objects appear blue than a blue object seem to look white...so of course i will say it's white with a shadow effect