It's sad that that poor attempt for journalism is going to be counted towards her score. Not only did he do exactly what he promised not to do in write about her persona and public perception, but he offered absolutely nothing constructive, all he did was insult the album and do clearly with stupid bias. Reflects on the publication that they can't even pick a writer that doesn't already insult her and know **** about her. Not to mention how clearly misinformed he is calling her manufactured...has he even seen a review or read anything SHE says and not written by the media...she is one of the most hard-working genuine song-writers and the fact that he can't even clearly check the writing credits correctly. I weep for him and his pathetic soul, but it's not worth fighting him. I hope the publication and him suffer their own demise into irrelevancy for being **** unprofessional writers. The main reason I'd love for her to keep a 70+ is because it seems it would mean a lot to her to be taken seriously as a writer and considering all the risks she has taken with this album and all the lies that revolve around her she really really deserves this one thing. She already is phenomenal and real, now after suffering at the hands of the media it would be lovely to see Ultraviolence be well received especially since it deserves to be.