Omg poor Gaga. To crash the critic saying is it right or is it wrong. I told you it was Scarlett who was serving the real Artpop.
And now instead of a letter grade review they wrote a lengthy "analysis"
http://popwatch.ew.com/2014/04/10/un...nathan-glazer/
@scottEweinberg
Maybe we should just keep everything but Adam Sandler movies away from EW from now on.
@glenndunks
Don't like UNDER THE SKIN? Fair enough. But that @EW review is an insult to filmmakers, artists, writers, thinkers, people in general.
BenDavid Grabinski @bdgrabinski
Oh my god that review for UNDER THE SKIN in entertainment weekly is crazy stupid. I can't even link to it.
@scottEweinberg
Only serves to make good critics look better. I guess. RT @kurtkerby @EW That UNDER THE SKIN "review" is grim.
@willhitell
Man, "Under The Skin" is still resonating with me. I understand the polarization of the movie, but @EW your review is so off the mark.
@CinemaBuffy
Watch a bid for the middle & vicious anti-intellectuallism masquerade as a 'review' of Under the Skin. @EW
@rockmarooned
And yeah, that @EW review of Under the Skin is the most vacuous review I've read since the same guy took on Nymphomaniac Part 1.
@briandstdenis
The @EW reviewer of UNDER THE SKIN should read the book. It's literal in all the ways the film is not. Plus: no celebrities being "arty."
@SamuelAAdams
That controversial non-review of Scarlett Johansson’s “Under the Skin”? Entertainment Weekly’s sorry about that.
queen of real controversy!