If she ever goes back to one of those colours she's tried in this "rainbow" for a more semi-permanent period of time or even for a music video / cover shoot, I'd prefer the turquoise or the blue, that's for sure. Maybe even one blending into the other.
Yep, the cat cult thing is really cringeworthy
I agree with Sam, if you read the comments you'll see that the GP's opinion of her hasn't changed
Totally. I mean, everyone's gonna have haters, but it's better to be on the Katy side of the fan to hater ratio than the Gaga side if you know what I mean. And right now, Kesha is making Gaga look like the most liked popstar ever. It's okay to have haters, but not when the majority of the GP think you're a trashy hoe and you make fun bops but can't really sing and won't buy your album.
Quote:
Originally posted by !Blue!
No, maybe, no
The 'Total Domination' title came to fruition from a thread a member made pointing out that albums with the album title with the initials TD have slayed in the past (Fergie's The Dutchess, Katy's Teenage Dream) and had 5 smash singles. I pointed out that both albums were released four years apart (2006 and 2010 respectively) and that the next one would be released in 2014, proceeding to say it would be Kesha's album called 'Total Domination".
The Zedd and Iggy bit was taking a poke at the fact that many Animals have frequently talked about / discussed the possibility of a collab with those. That would be an awful combination and definitely not the sound I want for ha lead single.
Like literally though, I'm watching the interview right now again and it literally annoys me so much how little she cares about the social component of her career. Does she not realise that the whole point of public appearances / social media etc is to establish and build on connections with people? If people actually like Kesha as a person they're going to be a lot more willing to buy her album even if they aren't a fan of the lead single. Just look at Taylor her country music fans still buying 'Red' even with a bubblegum pop lead single. That's because Taylor is extremely likeable as a person to most people. She's a sweetheart. Whereas Kesha is very bold. You either love her or you hate her.
What's most irritating is that she is an intelligent woman and she does make ****ing awesome music, she definitely would be able to stand on her own. Instead of being so secretive about her upcoming album she should be exploiting any buzz around her in order to give away little bits and pieces of information, getting people more and more interested into what's going on. Singing little bits live not only to keep people interested but to show that she does have a voice and that she doesn't need the studio to sound good. She could really express how much she is putting into this record and show that she's not just a puppet and that she writes all of her own music. There is SO much she could talk about that would be so beneficial to her career, yet she somehow finds a way to talk about the most irrelevant and irritating things that makes it seem as if every step she takes forward with her new image, she takes two steps right back.
As a stan, it's so annoying to see. Surely I cannot be the only one who thinks this?
Totally. I mean, everyone's gonna have haters, but it's better to be on the Katy side of the fan to hater ratio than the Gaga side if you know what I mean. And right now, Kesha is making Gaga look like the most liked popstar ever. It's okay to have haters, but not when the majority of the GP think you're a trashy hoe and you make fun bops but can't really sing and won't buy your album.
The 'Total Domination' title came to fruition from a thread a member made pointing out that albums with the album title with the initials TD have slayed in the past (Fergie's The Dutchess, Katy's Teenage Dream) and had 5 smash singles. I pointed out that both albums were released four years apart (2006 and 2010 respectively) and that the next one would be released in 2014, proceeding to say it would be Kesha's album called 'Total Domination".
The Zedd and Iggy bit was taking a poke at the fact that many Animals have frequently talked about / discussed the possibility of a collab with those. That would be an awful combination and definitely not the sound I want for ha lead single.
Oh.. didn't see that thread
I mean Zedd could be cute for the lead single but that not necessarily what i want and what she needs.
And Iggy... eh, definitely not on a lead single.
Sorry for the essays again y'all, I know how some of y'all hate 'em.
I would like the lead single to be Kesha and Kesha only. A Greg Kurstin (or some other producer... Pete Nappi perhaps?) produced track penned by Kesha and Kesha only would slay.
Totally. I mean, everyone's gonna have haters, but it's better to be on the Katy side of the fan to hater ratio than the Gaga side if you know what I mean. And right now, Kesha is making Gaga look like the most liked popstar ever. It's okay to have haters, but not when the majority of the GP think you're a trashy hoe and you make fun bops but can't really sing and won't buy your album.
The 'Total Domination' title came to fruition from a thread a member made pointing out that albums with the album title with the initials TD have slayed in the past (Fergie's The Dutchess, Katy's Teenage Dream) and had 5 smash singles. I pointed out that both albums were released four years apart (2006 and 2010 respectively) and that the next one would be released in 2014, proceeding to say it would be Kesha's album called 'Total Domination".
The Zedd and Iggy bit was taking a poke at the fact that many Animals have frequently talked about / discussed the possibility of a collab with those. That would be an awful combination and definitely not the sound I want for ha lead single.
The poor stans on Youtube have to remind everyone that she has an IQ of 140 under each video
The poor stans on Youtube have to remind everyone that she has an IQ of 140 under each video
Yeah, it's kinda sad how that's all they have. IQ really doesn't mean all that much. Personality and intelligence are two completely different things. Which is why she has an IQ of above 140 but has the personality she does. I kinda love that about ha though.
Still, she should be playing it a little bit smarter than she is. I just hope I'm wrong and she knows what she's doing.
Sorry for the essays again y'all, I know how some of y'all hate 'em.
I would like the lead single to be Kesha and Kesha only. A Greg Kurstin (or some other producer... Pete Nappi perhaps?) produced track penned by Kesha and Kesha only would slay.
I'm down for Greg.
I really want him to produce a song like Rita's Radioactive. He did a great job on it
Interviewers recycle the same questions, so she always frames her responses in the same way. Either that, or her PR team issue a list of things she's allowed to talk about. Her interviews were only exciting when she was an up-and-coming artist.
By the time she scored a few hits, she was swept up under the Hollywood rug like every other artist who makes it. I'm glad she did that documentary series for MTV, otherwise we wouldn't know that much about her. It's the most real she was.
Glad I'm not the only one who dislikes the cat cult thing, otherwise I'd probably feel a lot worse about it than I do. But it really is quite dumb.
Radioactive is the best song of Rita's career so yes I'd be here for that. Greg is so versatile as a producer though so she could make anything with him and it would slay... I mean who'd have thought that Radioactive, Goodness Gracious, Love Into The Light, Double Rainbow and most of 1000 Forms Of Fear / Sheezus would be produced by the same person. And of course he produced her best song, "Animal". I'd love for her to do 4-6 tracks with Greg alone on the next album, tbh.
I mean who'd have thought that Radioactive, Goodness Gracious, Love Into The Light, Double Rainbow and most of 1000 Forms Of Fear / Sheezus would be produced by the same person
