Quote:
Originally posted by Arioso
Okay no, you're really not getting what I'm saying - I'm saying that the differences in our perception are entirely negligible, and what we're ACTUALLY arguing about is a case of terminology and how we are taught to give names or identification to color.
Monte's dark white joke is like, the KEY to what I'm saying. We both perceive this:
in almost exactly the same way. It's how we verbalize and identify this perception that differs and causes confusion. I know that the colors around it will alter our perception and I know the physics that you're talking, but what I'm saying is that if we both look at the same photo, the only thing that's really different is how we think about the color based on how others have taught us. You logically know that white can appear darker, even bluish, because of shade. I logically know that black can appear gold because of light exposure. This is where the argument happens - whether it's actually what we see, this or that
and now I'm lost and rambling but I'm pretty sure we're just not on the same page with what we're actually arguing about so
|
yeah you're making sense
but this isnt magenta and pink sis
this is BLUE/white and BLACK/gold
i think the possiblity of people growing up to learn how to identify these colors wrong is almost impossible.