Oh, Ezra. Really? You're going to straight up lie to us? Very well.
The following text, posted by you, lacks any citations or links whatsoever:
Quote:
Originally posted by ezra
You're still holding on to it. "Solely". As if I'm even partly responsible for other peoples lives because I was born white. 
(1). I agree. Schools should be funded justly (not equally) by state not by local communities alone. It leaves children in positions where their community is poor and their educational opportunities are stymied. You think Hillary Clinton is going to do jack about the educational funding system? Come on, now.. There's still problems with this anyway. I went to a really wealthy school where I live. Does "equality" mean we need to lower funding for schools that have a lot and give it to areas that don't? That seems unjust to those wealthy areas that worked for what they have (I know my family did!). Sounds like Marxism, actually. I think areas should still fund their schools locally but there needs to be an "at minimum" amount per area that the state makes up for if the local community can't on their own. That would be the wealthy and middle class subsidizing poorer areas. Probably a good idea to stop demonizing these people, right? And about recruiting teachers for poor schools. LOL. Do you have any plan how you would go about that (Hillary sure doesn't!)? I know for a fact that teachers here in Michigan would only go to Detroit to teach if at gunpoint (awful pay, huge student load, usually far drive, no benefits). Are we going to coerce these teachers into doing jobs they don't want somehow? This plan kind of stinks. 
(2). Free stuff? You think condoms (which have been available for decades and you can buy in most bathrooms for a quarter) are going to solve this issue? This is just dodging responsibility. I agree Planned Parenthood should be funded. That's been around for decades as well and welp, here we are. Problems as big as ever. Birth control for young girls has all kinds of drawbacks by the way. It's a huge deal to take that and can really screw with your body. Just to keep in mind.
This is an entire other argument that has to do with biology and sexual dimorphic traits. I do not think women should be on the front lines unless able to meet the minimum requirements (so, it's never going to be 50/50 like you and other feminists want). Congress is actually moving to make the draft a thing women do  It's spear-headed by liberals at the moment.
Sigh. I have a lot of work to do in here. Voting Hillary will continue all these problems (especially the ones against black men; Mrs. "Super Predators" is a feminist and we know who feminists categorize men and how they want the law to be even more strict and ruthless with them).
 |
Quote:
Originally posted by ezra
How could those things not be related, my friend? Low education and high drop out rates lead to smaller median incomes. Lower median incomes lead to lower quality of life and difficulty raising a family. This in turn breaks up families, dads peace out and leave women with children. We know for a FACT that single mothers are not optimal settings for child rearing and fathers/2 parent households are needed. This in turn effects young men in growing up without a father figure and can lead them into criminal activity and arrests. It's all connected and they are all apart of the problem. Here's the solution: 1) stay married 2) don't have kids until you can afford it 3) stay in school. We cannot just turn around and blame the holy ghost of "whiteness", worshiping at the altar of "intersectionality" while ignoring the real issues on the ground. Bernie/Hillary refuse to acknowledge the bit where all these people actually do have control over their lives and do need to make more responsible choices for themselves and their kids. Acknowledging the facts does not mean I am a racist or a troll or whatever other names I've been called in here (I don't care what you call me by the way I'm just pointing out that it's not an argument to call me a troll and walk away). /endrant
I have said that the criminal justice system inordinately seems stacked against men and black men in particular. Is it due to racism? Like, are cops purposefully going and arresting black men because they are black? Well, no but also kind of yes. It's due to a lot of things that involve high crime areas and the people living there wanting more police protection. More police will lead to more arrests and confrontations. These high crime areas tend to be poorer and less white. Refer to my paragraph above as to why this is not really racism.
Of course men make up those powerful positions. Men have a natural urge and desire to go for those positions. You might not like what I'm about to say but women just don't want to hold those jobs that's why they don't have them. Western countries are the most free places for women on Earth. No one is stopping a woman from running for any office, being a CEO, being in the military, running a business etc. except themselves. Women have the choice to do it or not in these Western countries and they usually choose not to. So, men (who want these jobs) take them. And at a steep price by the way.
Things like locomotive work, garbage men, electricians, police officers, ice road truckers lol, septic tank cleaners, construction of all kinds, heavy lifting and mechanical work etc. etc.. Men take these jobs because they want them. Women do not. Stop blaming men for the choices that women make. And stop trying to force women to do jobs they do not want to do.
I've already addressed why I think this is bogus. BLM is extremely divisive and purely based on emotional rhetoric. They have no real positions based in fact it's all a blame game and white people are the ones they've scapegoated.
-
Good talk! At the end of the day, most successful black people (especially rappers) know they love Donald Trump because he's a boss. He's the American dream and wants to teach the rest of the country how to get there rather than give them excuses for staying where they are (Bernie/Clinton). He's not trying to keep people on government services like the left is; rather, make them take back control of their lives. That's why I support him and that's why everyone should.
|
Now then! Since we have that established, let's take a look at the other side of things.
The following was the only material for which you provided any sources:
Quote:
Originally posted by ezra
Well, I'm glad you think it's funny. The reality is, feminists have completely fabricated a western "rape culture" that does not exist. Especially on campus where you're less likely to be a victim of sexual assault than elsewhere. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsavcaf9513.pdf
And obviously we can't deport nationals. But why hang on to rapists that aren't even citizens? |
Nevermind how the first two lack any discussion of anything more than surface-level statistics and fail to support any of your subsequent claims. Nevermind how you completely misconstrued the second to fit your anti-feminist (and by extension, anti-equity and anti-equality) agenda. You cited these!
I expect some sort of substantial corroboration of the rest of your claims before I rebut later; otherwise, I'll just be wasting my time disproving things that weren't even supported in the first place.
I think the UN has more to worry about then Democratic primaries.
