Quote:
Originally posted by Cockney Cupcake
Just saw this on twitter ... i don't know the Telegraph like one step above the Sun so.. on the other hand if she is not working for that new album already  i need her to announce something at the grammys at least mention a new album is being produced !
|
Yeah, any source is better than
The Sun, and again... I don't think they have any real hardcore evidence, but they'd be more likely to have proof as opposed to
The Sun. I'm assuming she will announce something right before the Grammys, during the Grammys, or right after the Grammys. At least I hope so. As long as she is attending, which we should know very soon, we should know something by the end of the month. I don't think she'd pass up the opportunity to be at the Grammys, though, she usually doesn't skip. I don't know why she would this year; avoiding being asked about her baby and her new album isn't a good excuse because she avoided it at the Golden Globes during that press conference.
Quote:
Originally posted by Cockney Cupcake
Also i just wanna sk you guys how do the rate thing works?
Do i just put a number from 1 to 10 next to the song? Do i have to use all numbers cause tbh none of her songs deserve a 1,2 or 3 and last question cann i use a number more than once?
|
You just rate the songs. You can use the numbers more than once. Like, for example... If I was rating the songs from
21 (keep in mind these are random numbers, not my rates):
1. "Rolling in the Deep": 10/10
2. "Rumour Has It": 9/10
3. "Turning Tables": 10/10
4. "Don't You Remember": 9/10
5. "Set Fire to the Rain": 8/10
Etc....
Basically, you're just rating every one of her songs on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the best. Does that make sense?