Quote:
Originally posted by INA
Clearly talking about the article even though the article came out after the live stream and at that moments they were talking about album reviews lmfaoooooo you can believe what you want, but they control their twitters 99% of the time. They aren't Britney spears and they've said it numerous times. Get over it. If it's man. why didn't they say anything on Harry's account when people twisted the context of his words? Why would their management care if people thought he was supporting the LGBT community? That's good publicity. Nothing you're saying is making sense.
|
Dude, stop talking out your ****ing braindead ass.
The Independent article came out Sunday morning. I saw it myself before the "interview" happened. Please tell me what other Independent article Liam was talking about then? I'm waiting!
And that's great they say no one else tweets from their account, OBVIOUSLY they're not going to say "hur dur our PR people tweet for us a lot" (which is true of almost all celebs). Since you're the most knowledgeable ****ing fan on the face of the earth, you yourself should know how many times the boys have "tweeted" while they were asleep or dumb **** like that. Or as I pointed out in the other thread, the time a whole series of tweets (not even promo ones) came through on Liam's account in perfect grammar, then were deleted and re-tweeted with his signature style. Wow I wonder why that was.
As for Harry not denying anything, the whole point is that Louis is the one who actually has something to hide. This is literally the same pattern with every celebrity who eventually comes out (Tom Daley hihi). They do not want him connected to that in any way. It's not that ****ing hard to get through your thick skull.
This is the last time I'll be replying to you or talking about this topic because 1) you're annoying as hell and clearly oblivious to everything Louis has said and done outside of Twitter over the last few years 2) Louis geigh
Who knows?
