Quote:
Originally posted by KESTER
From what you're saying, I agree to some extent.
I don't think there's anything wrong with adopting certain things that are popular in a certain culture, but when it's so general and very stereotypical, it just seems ignorant.
Like when someone does an impression of gay person with the lisp and weak wrists etc.. It's stereotypical and wrong.
|
Agreed. Additionally, claiming you are 'a black woman inside' if you are not, in fact, a black woman, is offensive and belittling to their real-world struggles for the sake of a 'cute' caricature of them. Just like how claiming you are a gay man inside is offensive (I've seen both). I don't see how anyone could see otherwise, I honestly just think the confusion and/or aversion most people have to it is due to the title.
Quote:
Originally posted by JonnyϟLightning
How about NO. What the hell? SERIOUSLY? Did you just compare black oppression to gay oppression?
|
No, he simply said both identities are outside the ideal white hetero-normative ideal in our societies, and that both can be celebrated (without making it a competition). What's wrong with that
