Quote:
Originally posted by NE.
They feel as though there's some unspoken rule that she should be granted immunity at the risk of possibly damaging her chances, because she's just so much better and the "only right choice" apparently. Wikileaks could drop an email confirming she's the head of Al-Qaeda, and there would still be a witch hunt against anyone who dares hold her accountable for her corruption.
Some are sitting around gunning for someone to leak info on Trump but as soon as Hillary has her ass busted wide open yet AGAIN only days before the GE, I'm reading people on here saying that it's "unfair" and that they're "disrupting" the election.
If we're going to make an objective assessment of both candidates, why not lay everything out on the table for both? Hillary supporters need to drop the god complex and stop acting like she's above reproach.
|
The dramatics and persecution complex.

Let's see that email and see what the response is in this thread.
First of all, many of us in this thread have solidly criticized Hillary Clinton for her past decisions. You act as if supporting Hillary means ignoring all the things she's ever done - yes, I recognize she has her flaws, and I'm choosing to say her positives outweigh the flaws.
Secondly, there's a precedent for FBI to not make announcements like this 60 days before the election because of what the ramifications are. So yes, it's "disrupting" the election when Comey knows for a fact the investigation won't be finished in the next 11 days and he doesn't even know the significance of the emails are.
Why are people mad that Hillary's stuff is getting leaked? Because government officials have been on record saying that Russia is behind the hacks. Guess whose emails are being leaked? The DNC's only.
You want people to make an objective assessment of both candidates with everything on the table? Great! Let's see the RNC emails.