I'm a bit stressed about Michigan and Wisconsin after the primaries in both states
Don't be. There were many factors that altered Michigan
Let's stick with the most known ones: 1) Hillary supporters thought she would win so they voted Kasich to stop Trump 2) There weren't many polls done 3)There was no Michigan primary in 2008 to compare the electorate 4)Bernie had a strong debate performance and town hall right before. And Bernie lead in most Wisconsin polls.
Michigan and Wisconsin ARE blue for the GE. Don't be nervous.
This silent support is very unlikely and unprecedented.
For decades, the candidate who was ahead in polling won. The candidates who won the debates usually won. The candidate who had a bigger convention boost usually won. There is simply no recent election to point to that showed a wave election in the last WEEK.
Let's say Hillary wins the election but fails to win Florida, Ohio, and Nevada.
Would that be considered a hollow victory?
Hillary losing those Obama-won states could mean that the country is starting to gravitate towards the Republicans again.
Well for one that's not happening. But this election is not a really good indicator of where the electorate is going. Georgia, Texas, Arizona, and Utah are toss-ups trending Democratic while Iowa and Ohio are trending red.
And then you have Colorado, Virginia, and North Carolina trending blue fast.
Let's say Hillary wins the election but fails to win Florida, Ohio, and Nevada.
Would that be considered a hollow victory?
Hillary losing those Obama-won states could mean that the country is starting to gravitate towards the Republicans again.
Not really. This has been a different election. It wasn't your traditional democrat vs. republican election.
Trump's rise is about more than a vote for right wing politics. Most of the people voting for Trump are voting for him as a way to send a big **** you to Washington.
She needs to put her ****ing foot down on these mother ****ers.
That's one thing about Hillary that Obama lacks.
Being a Clinton, she doesn't **** around with that stuff. And she's very well connected (for better or worse).
Chaffetz is trying to be the one to take down the Clintons so that he can run for president on that achievement. Poor deluded soul! No one outsmarted the Clintons in the past, and no one will now. Only one guy was able to beat a Clinton and he became a GOP enemy and a Clinton BFF.
That's one thing about Hillary that Obama lacks.
Being a Clinton, she doesn't **** around with that stuff.
This is why I feel like Hillary should have been president for the past 8 years. I love Obama but he would have been better suited to be running now after making relationships in Washington, etc.
I hope her first day in office she just turns **** upside down and scares the **** out of republicans in Congress.
Bill Maher put it best about the Clinton's. They don't work with republicans, they just beat them at their own game.
He'll probably dedicate Miss Independent to the Rodham.
