[uhoh-ohno]

Originally posted by Giselle

Yes, she associated this with her womanhood because sexist and misogynistic attacks HAVE been thrown at her It has EVERYTHING to do with agency over her body. And she's not "using feminism" People are trying to strip her of her agency and her staking ownership over it does not mean she's using feminism. A woman standing up for herself from misogynistic attacks does not equate to her trying to be a feminist champion.

Except no one is saying that she can't pose nude or creating laws to prevent her from doing it. However, if you do these things in the public sphere, then there will likely be commentary. Neither Middler nor Moretz tried to take away Kim's ability to use nudity in yet another one of her successful publicity stunts.

[Giselle]

And if you think only some women are worthy of "using feminism" (which is a dumb idea, standing up for women doesn't mean you're using feminism), then you're not really a supporter of feminism

[James Maslow]

Originally posted by FOCK

Men have been profiting from women's sexualities for centuries. Yet the minute a woman uses her own sexuality to her own advantage, she is shamed.

That's like saying "white men have been profiting from slavery for centuries, yet the minute a black man enslave another to their advantage, they're ashamed." Don't be so dense 😞

[Ascension]

Originally posted by Giselle

Yes, she associated this with her womanhood because sexist and misogynistic attacks HAVE been thrown at her It has EVERYTHING to do with agency over her body. And she's not "using feminism" People are trying to strip her of her agency and her staking ownership over it does not mean she's using feminism. A woman standing up for herself from misogynistic attacks does not equate to her trying to be a feminist champion.

So what exactly did that open letter have to do with international women's day if she weren't attempting to angle it as some sort of feminist narrative? The first people she went after were two women that made no sexist or misogynistic comments as it related to what she did at all. This is her deflecting plain and simple.

[Javan]

Originally posted by Giselle

People calling her a ****, *****, hoe, etc is SEXIST There is no way around that! When she is being attacked by MISOGYNISTS, she has every right to defend herself from that.

I'm not saying that everyone who is attacking her is innocent. I'm sure many are guilty of sexism.

Rihanna is victim to sexism as well when she expresses her sexuality. But again, you have to ask why is Kim's backlash greater when Rihanna doesn't even bother putting censors on her nips

[Badger]

Take a break guys

[Britney Jean]

lmao people trying to argue with Giselle while it's very clear that Kim is always right in his/her eyes. Don't waste your time sistrens

[Giselle]

Originally posted by Ascension

So what exactly did that open letter have to do with international women's day if she weren't attempting to angle it as some sort of feminist narrative? The first people she went after were two women that made no sexist or misogynistic comments as it related to what she did at all. This is her deflecting plain and simple.

Oh my god The letter spoke too a larger point about women's agency. That's what it had to do with IWD. She's not claiming to be the next Gloria Steinem or tweeting videos about feminism. She simply wrote about an issue that she and many other women go through. She's not trying to spin why she posted it. Regardless of why she posted it, many of her attackers were doing it from a purely misogynistic basis and she called that out. All women are allowed to defend themselves from misogyny. And it doesn't mean you wanna be the next big feminist. It's that damn simple.

[Mekitor]

[Shame♥]

Originally posted by Javan

I'm not saying that everyone who is attacking her is innocent. I'm sure many are guilty of sexism.

Rihanna is victim to sexism as well when she expresses her sexuality. But again, you have to ask why is Kim's backlash greater when Rihanna doesn't even bother putting censors on her nips

Rihanna is not a polarizing figure like Kim.

[Giselle]

Originally posted by Shame♥

Rihanna is not a polarizing figure like Kim.

Right. Plus Rihanna doesn't have a sextape. Due to that sextape, the idea is "Kim, if you want us to forgive you, we better never see you be sexual again." and Kim's whole point is that she is not going to subscribe to this.

[Javan]

Originally posted by Giselle

Right. Plus Rihanna doesn't have a sextape. Due to that sextape, the idea is "Kim, if you want us to forgive you, we better never see you be sexual again." and Kim's whole point is that she is not going to subscribe to this.

You keep dancing around the fundamental point that don't if she went to college or tried to market her talents and not her body, her feedback will be completely different. Stop the victim narrative

[Giselle]

Originally posted by Javan

You keep dancing around the fundamental point that don't if she went to college or tried to market her talents and not her body, her feedback will be completely different. Stop the victim narrative

No, I'm not disagreeing with that. My point is that women shouldn't have to follow your standards for it to be OK when she's nude. And she is a victim. Of endless misogyny and sexism.

[all eyes on me]

so the point of the day is: kim has a right to post whatever she wants and giselle is still an overweight extreme feminist that probably lives in her parents basement and masterbates with cottage cheese that only applies feminism and equality to certain groups/ideals that she likes or will benefit her. (ex: her sig//attacks on other women/pop girls)

[Penny.]

Originally posted by Javan

I'm not saying that everyone who is attacking her is innocent. I'm sure many are guilty of sexism.

Rihanna is victim to sexism as well when she expresses her sexuality. But again, you have to ask why is Kim's backlash greater when Rihanna doesn't even bother putting censors on her nips

becos Rihanna is famous for a lot more than her body-she is a multitalented woman who has made herself an Icon by working her ass off wheras Kim has literally done nothing but make a sex tape & be born into money-she has no talent & does nothing to earn any kind of respect

Rihanna uses her sexuality for her art
Kim uses her body for fame

[Sunshine.]

Originally posted by Javan

I'm not saying that everyone who is attacking her is innocent. I'm sure many are guilty of sexism.

Rihanna is victim to sexism as well when she expresses her sexuality. But again, you have to ask why is Kim's backlash greater when Rihanna doesn't even bother putting censors on her nips

Check my sig.

Cause whenever soméoné élsé does something the least bit sexual, everyone loses their ****. Irrespective of the height of her other achievements. It's all very annoying, juvenile, and sexist.

[HASHTAGPOW]

thank you for education me princess

[cancer]

Originally posted by all eyes on me

so the point of the day is: kim has a right to post whatever she wants and giselle is still an overweight extreme feminist that probably lives in her parents basement and masterbates with cottage cheese that only applies feminism and equality to certain groups/ideals that she likes or will benefit her. (ex: her sig//attacks on other women/pop girls)

[Javan]

At this point even ****stars deserve more respect than Kim. The sex industry may not require intelligence, but It's labour intensive and it takes commitment to give a satisfying performance. So they are at least honing their craft somewhat. What is Kim's craft? She does nothing of value and she flaunts that fact. Of course people wont like her

[Ascension]

Originally posted by Giselle

Oh my god The letter spoke too a larger point about women's agency. That's what it had to do with IWD. She's not claiming to be the next Gloria Steinem or tweeting videos about feminism. She simply wrote about an issue that she and many other women go through. She's not trying to spin why she posted it. Regardless of why she posted it, many of her attackers were doing it from a purely misogynistic basis and she called that out. All women are allowed to defend themselves from misogyny. And it doesn't mean you wanna be the next big feminist. It's that damn simple.

yet I'm a bad role model for being proud of my body?

She's deflecting WITH this point. Nobody said she's a bad role model for being proud of her body; however, the point she can't respond with is that she can't state what else she has to offer outside of periodic publicity stunts that mostly revolve around her showing her body in various ways. It's great she's proud of her body, but most peoples' concern as it pertains to her is that her success is built off of nothing outside of that, young girls look up to her for no other reason than the fact that she was able to build massive wealth and success off of literally nothing.

Nobody said she's trying to be Gloria Steinham or some great feminist leader -- just that she's using it as a convenience which is far worse than her using it out of genuine aspiration to be a feminist champion. I'm saying she's using feminism as a convenient deflection away from the real point of her inability to defend her type celebrity so she spins the narrative into one about her being devalued as a woman as opposed to the concern of her having nothing real to offer as a person yet being celebrated as if she does.