[Sasha.]

Originally posted by Giselle

On one of the polls I gave, where Hillary is not far behind. Hillary is the #1 (thirteen years in a row! don't forget it, don't forget it!) on the other I listed!

I'm sorry, but am I missing something here? The poll you talk about:

Gallup’s most admired man and woman poll is an annual poll that Gallup has conducted at the end of most years since 1948. Americans are asked, without prompting, to say what man and woman "living today in any part of the world, do [they] admire most?"

So that's only her popularity amongst Americans?

[rivers]

Originally posted by Marvin

Bernie actually does have sources.

Again, all you're doing is deflecting. Her plans aren't realistic.

How so?

[Giselle]

Woo. This is really too much. Hillary is such a legend.

If MERYL speaks at the DNC

[@michael]

Originally posted by Bloo

Sources for SOME of his stuff... None of which are his policy proposal numbers... :rip

Marvin.... I'm going to actually need you to sit down and try to explain, in detail, how Bernie's plans are realistic and Hillary's aren't?

[@michael]

Originally posted by Giselle

Woo. This is really too much. Hillary is such a legend.

If MERYL speaks at the DNC

Would actually love for her to be VP

[Giselle]

Originally posted by Sasha.

I'm sorry, but am I missing something here? The poll you talk about:



So that's only her popularity amongst Americans?

I gave one poll where she has major respect across the globe and another where she is the single most respected in the US. I mean, there's nothing too complicated about anything I posted. Put 2+2 together.

[rivers]

Originally posted by Bloo

Sources for SOME of his stuff... None of which are his policy proposal numbers... :rip

Marvin.... I'm going to actually need you to sit down and try to explain, in detail, how Bernie's plans are realistic and Hillary's aren't?

He's probably gonna ignore your post

[Butters]

Originally posted by Sasha.

I'm sorry, but am I missing something here? The poll you talk about:



So that's only her popularity amongst Americans?

It's really not important if she's #1 or #3. It's clear she's a well known and influential (and popular) person. Not that any of this should determine whether she should get the us presidency

[Sasha.]

Originally posted by Giselle

I gave one poll where she has major respect across the globe and another where she is the single most respected in the US. I mean, there's nothing too complicated about anything I posted. Put 2+2 together.

I am putting 2 + 2 together but it doesn't add up to the most admired woman in the world when she isn't #1 on the world ranking and she's #1 in the poll where only Americans are asked?

[Marvin]

Originally posted by Bloo

Marvin.... I'm going to actually need you to sit down and try to explain, in detail, how Bernie's plans are realistic and Hillary's aren't?

I'm not talking about Bernie.

I am asking you (and anyone else in here) how HER plans are so realistic since everyone keeps saying that, yet her website reveals the opposite. Throwing out these big numbers to fund programs with no way to get the money is NOT realistic. Just because her plans are "moderate" does not make them realistic. There is a difference. Why can't this question be answered without mentioning someone else?

[Bloo]

Originally posted by rivers

He's probably gonna ignore your post

No, probably say that they're unrealistic from a prison cell.

[@michael]

Originally posted by rivers

He's probably gonna ignore your post

[Sasha.]

Originally posted by Butters

It's really not important if she's #1 or #3. It's clear she's a well known and influential (and popular) person. Not that any of this should determine whether she should get the us presidency

The term "the most admired woman in the world" was used. I'm just doing what politifact would do!

[Giselle]

Originally posted by Butters

It's really not important if she's #1 or #3. It's clear she's a well known and influential (and popular) person.

Like

[Marvin]

Originally posted by rivers

He's probably gonna ignore your post

I only ignore dumb posts.

Bloo and RatedG seem to be two of the only Hillary supporters in here capable of having actual discussions.

[@michael]

Originally posted by Marvin

I'm not talking about Bernie.

I am asking you (and anyone else in here) how HER plans are so realistic since everyone keeps saying that, yet her website reveals the opposite. Throwing out these big numbers to fund programs with no way to get the money is NOT realistic. Just because her plans are "moderate" does not make them realistic. There is a difference. Why can't this question be answered without mentioning someone else?

Why do you want the opposing candidate's plans explained but you never go into details on your own candidate's agenda? It just makes you look silly and somewhat pressed!

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by Sasha.

He had 27 years. She had 8 years

198 bills introduced a year for Bernie (compared to 271 for Hillary)

130 bills a year reached committee consideration for Bernie (compared to 66 for Hillary)

8 bills a year became law (compared to 10 for Hillary. Less committee considerations but more laws. Oop)

She does more with less time. Cancel this meme

[Giselle]

Originally posted by Sasha.

The term "the most admired woman in the world" was used. I'm just doing what politifact would do!

No, you're being overanalytical and trying too hard. Again, whether she's #1 or #3, it is arguable that she is the most admired woman in the world. And that respect will only go UP, when she becomes POTUS

[Marvin]

Originally posted by Bloo

No, probably say that they're unrealistic from a prison cell.

I didn't think of that... but!

[@michael]

Originally posted by RatedG²

He had 27 years. She had 8 years

198 bills introduced a year for Bernie (compared to 271 for Hillary)

130 bills a year reached committee consideration for Bernie (compared to 66 for Hillary)

8 bills a year became law (compared to 10 for Hillary)

She does more with less time. Cancel this meme

#FeelTheMath