[Wafflecakes]

Originally posted by BTrisc

At least Sony's lack of exclusives isn't nearly as embarrassing at Nintendo's lack of third party support.

All this off topic. I suppose I will play


Nintendo hasn't had 3rd party support on its consoles for a couple decades.... why did it suddenly become embarrassing now?



Other console manufacturers should be embarrassed that they NEED 3rd party support when Nintendo doesn't.

Maybe Sony/MS should learn to make good games so they don't have to beg and cry to 3rd parties?

[BTrisc]

Originally posted by Echelon

If I need exclusives I go to the source. If I need third party support I can go to Xbox One or PC, instead of PS4. Considering how these games are releasing, you can even go to PS3 or Xbox 360.

Nobody needs Pokémon Art Academy or Wii Sports Club though.

[Attitude]

Originally posted by NaughtyDog

PS4 users will be playing Destiny, Drive Club, Unity, Far Cry 4, CoD, LBP 3, etc

even if they are multiplatform it will still have more games than the Wii U's Bayonetta 2, Toad thingy, Super Smash Bro, and its lack of 3rd party support

So a bunch of FPS games, a mediocre shooter, and a game from a series that has reached it's peak.
Amazing!

[BTrisc]

Originally posted by Waffles O'Brien

All this off topic. I suppose I will play


Nintendo hasn't had 3rd party support on its consoles for a couple decades.... why did it suddenly become embarrassing now?



Other console manufacturers should be embarrassed that they NEED 3rd party support when Nintendo doesn't.

Maybe Sony/MS should learn to make good games so they don't have to beg and cry to 3rd parties?

This thread was flamebait from the start.

And not true. Developers have come out and said that they won't make games for the Wii U until it begins to sell more units.

[Artemisia]

Originally posted by BTrisc

At least Sony's lack of exclusives isn't nearly as embarrassing at Nintendo's lack of third party support.

Really? It's not more embarrassing that Sony can't be ****ed to develop for their own console?

[Echelon]

Originally posted by BTrisc

Nobody needs Pokémon Art Academy or Wii Sports Club though.

They don't, but thankfully there is an abundance of exclusives to play on Xbox One and Wii U.

[BTrisc]

Originally posted by Attitude

So a bunch of FPS games, a mediocre shooter, and a game from a series that has reached it's peak.
Amazing!

Don't you have a PS3?

[BTrisc]

Originally posted by Echelon

They don't, but thankfully there is an abundance of exclusives to play on Xbox One and Wii U.

Then why aren't consumers responding?

[BTrisc]

Originally posted by Artemisia

Really? It's not more embarrassing that Sony can't be ****ed to develop for their own console?

It's not embarrassing considering they still manage to sell more units. You'd think these EXCLUSIVES would sell a system, right?

[Rigalo]

Good thing the Ps4 gets support from ALL companies so it doesn't have to rely on exclusives

The X1 does too... Does the other one?

[Echelon]

Originally posted by BTrisc

Then why aren't consumers responding?

I wish I knew!

Then I would share the secret with Sony so they can figure out why people keep avoiding their Non-NaughtyDog and God of War exclusives.

[Wafflecakes]

Originally posted by BTrisc

This thread was flamebait from the start.

And not true. Developers have come out and said that they won't make games for the Wii U until it begins to sell more units.

Developers are still bitter about Nintendo kicking their asses last gen.

I mean. Wii sold AMAZING and those hypocrite developers didn't make games for it either. Nor did they for the Gamecube.


It is sad how they lie out of jealousy

[Attitude]

Originally posted by BTrisc

Don't you have a PS3?

Yes.

[Haus_of_Will]

Can we just come together and celebrate everyone having at least an okay E3?

Video games not the bling.

[Rigalo]

Originally posted by Waffles O'Brien

Developers are still bitter about Nintendo kicking their asses last gen.

I mean. Wii sold AMAZING and those hypocrite developers didn't make games for it either. Nor did they for the Gamecube.


It is sad how they lie out of jealousy

The Wii was vastly underpowered compared to the other two systems lol. It wasn't even HD for christsake

[NaughtyDog]

Originally posted by Attitude

So a bunch of FPS games, a mediocre shooter, and a game from a series that has reached it's peak.
Amazing!

Dragon Age: Inquisition
The Crew
The Evil Within
etc


as oppose to what? more side-scrolling from Nintendo?

[BTrisc]

Originally posted by Waffles O'Brien

Developers are still bitter about Nintendo kicking their asses last gen.

I mean. Wii sold AMAZING and those hypocrite developers didn't make games for it either. Nor did they for the Gamecube.


It is sad how they lie out of jealousy

There were plenty of third party games for the Wii and Gamecube, coming from somebody who owned them.

[DvnR]

Originally posted by Artemisia

Really? It's not more embarrassing that Sony can't be ****ed to develop for their own console?

Of course not. Nobody wants to develop for the Wii U. Companies have gone out in public and dismissed the idea of developing games for them. I'd rather have a moderate amount of great exclusives with a large library of solid third party games than being so restricted as to only having exclusives, especially when they're resorting to spinoffs like Toad and Hyrule Warriors. The delusion and the obsession.

[Kool_Aid_King]

N++

[Wafflecakes]

Originally posted by Rigalo

The Wii was vastly underpowered compared to the other two systems lol. It wasn't even HD for christsake

Always some excuse.

If Wii-U was the most powerful system on the market they would be complaining that it was too expensive to develop for.

They are pressed and obsessed and will find some excuse to blame Nintendo for the fact that they cannot make games good enough to compete with Nintendo's first party releases.