Unfortunately you don't need a majority of them to win, a recent example, 2004 Howard Dean carried more superdelegates but Kerry defeated Dean in a run of primaries and caucuses and got the nomination.
Superdelegates are not there to support a candidate they are there to exercise independent judgment and if they see Hillary as damaged goods they may turn on her.
In Deans case he had more pledged superdelegates early but he imploded in Iowa. Remember his famous roar/scream/yell that essentially kill him?
absolutely not. the only dem votes he will get are from sexist men who cant stand that thought of a woman in charge. Hilary has nothing to worry about.
Sure as soon as one is up to the task. Are you suggesting we should just vote for a female for the sake of it?
Well, quite frankly, yes. Idk why y'all are making Hillary out to be the devil for something she said 15 years ago. I don't care for a political debate so if we could just leave it here...
because she, her husband, and their organization have been too shady and broken too many rules for her to last this entire campaign season without something finally putting the nail in her coffin. i think eventually most americans will grow not to trust her... the only chance she has of winning is if the females who wouldn't have voted otherwise but because they want a woman president all blindly vote for her just like the blacks who wouldn't have voted otherwise but because they wanted a black president all blindly voted for barack.
Hmm. Interesting. He's somebody that I can trust and go far. But it seems he's too progressive and I know there are people that don't like that. Going to fast I think? I would like to vote for Hillary and finally get our first woman president, but I can't seem to trust her at times. She seems to try too hard and wishy washy. Who do I want to see representing the Democrat side to go against the Republican side? I need to research on this later. I guess it's time for me to starting pay attention to this.
I did check out the thread about the 2016 election that is taking place in 2016, which is next year, and I don't like what I'm seeing, but I still need to do my research to see what democrat and what republican candidate I can go for.
Well, quite frankly, yes. Idk why y'all are making Hillary out to be the devil for something she said 15 years ago. I don't care for a political debate so if we could just leave it here...
I love progress but there is such a thing as being TOO progressive and Bernie Sanders fits that bill.
Bernie is not too progressive, he's a socialist that wants wealth in america to be distributed more evenly. too progressive would be the militant trade unions causing chaos in france right now and in 1970s/80s britain.
Unfortunately you don't need a majority of them to win, a recent example, 2004 Howard Dean carried more superdelegates but Kerry defeated Dean in a run of primaries and caucuses and got the nomination.
Superdelegates are not there to support a candidate they are there to exercise independent judgment and if they see Hillary as damaged goods they may turn on her.
In Deans case he had more pledged superdelegates early but he imploded in Iowa. Remember his famous roar/scream/yell that essentially kill him?
You don't know how the Superdelegates are going to vote either. In my opinion, they'll back Hilary. Bernie is not 2016's Obama.