This "already rich" argument is so damn dumb. Arent the owners of "Spotify already rich... Umm, I wonder if Mark Zuckerberg comes out with a streaming service, we will hear, "oh, but he's already rich. A black man does it and he's money hungry. BS.
Quote:
And the best part is that the labels are part-owners of the streaming services. When Spotify is acquired, the labels are gonna make a boatload of money (they all have shares in the company), and not a dime is getting passed on to the artists (nor should it). But when TIDAL gets acquired, you know who’s getting paid? Jay-Z. Not some indie rock band from Cleveland.
After reading the quote about more money going to the songwriters and producers and not just the performer, I have more respect for what Tidal is trying to do.
This "already rich" argument is so damn dumb. Arent the owners of "Spotify already rich... Umm, I wonder if Mark Zuckerberg comes out with a streaming service, we will hear, "oh, but he's already rich. A black man does it and he's money hungry. BS.
What I don't understand is how they pretend all of us to stop using Spotify (also paying in my case) if they're not offering something better or more valuable. I mean the GP won't even care, those exclusives they have are not enough, the vídeos? I already watch them daily on You Tube.
So yeah.... No thanks!
After reading the quote about more money going to the songwriters and producers and not just the performer, I have more respect for what Tidal is trying to do.
Its not like songwriters n producers r poor tho...yes they may lose money but yes they have much more than u n me and many more together