Ok but Gaga said that as if she produces her own sounds when she doesn't. Acoustic music comes from the soul, especially when done correctly, and most of the time the person singing it has written the song word for word just like she does in her electronic music, I think the comment was a tad disrespectful tbh, especially with the mention of Adele being right behind it.
She doesn't mean it that she thinks it's better, but making electronic music is harder than making acoustic music.
Ok but Gaga said that as if she produces her own sounds when she doesn't. Acoustic music comes from the soul, especially when done correctly, and most of the time the person singing it has written the song word for word just like she does in her electronic music, I think the comment was a tad disrespectful tbh, especially with the mention of Adele being right behind it.
I don't think it's disrespectful to attack the stereotype that if you do electro-pop you're inherently less talented than/inferior to someone who primarily utilizes acoustic instrumentation.
This is really an attack on that whole "real music" idea wherein silly people try to tell us that anything that involves a computer is of an inferior grade.
Ok but Gaga said that as if she produces her own sounds when she doesn't. Acoustic music comes from the soul, especially when done correctly, and most of the time the person singing it has written the song word for word just like she does in her electronic music, I think the comment was a tad disrespectful tbh, especially with the mention of Adele being right behind it.
To play acoustic music you need learn how to play a guitar/ piano and actually be good at it
To make electronic music all you need GarageBand Not to say that's it, but anybody can have a shot at making electronic stuff, but you need to know actual instruments to make acoustic music.
I know, but her degradation of the idea of acoustic music insinuates she's not interested in making a whole album of Acoustics. Even her potential ballads turn into electronic-high energy songs.
I've always thought something like this...it takes skill to make a good electronic song. I don't necessarily think one's "better" than the other, though.
To play acoustic music you need learn how to play a guitar/ piano and actually be good at it
To make electronic music all you need GarageBand Not to any that's it, but anybody can have a shot at making electronic stuff, but you need to know actual instruments to make acoustic music.
To play acoustic music you need learn how to play a guitar/ piano and actually be good at it
To make electronic music all you need GarageBand Not to any that's it, but anybody can have a shot at making electronic stuff, but you need to know actual instruments to make acoustic music.
right making acoustic requires actual musical talent, any person could into garageband or any software device and make an electronic dance song
I know, but her degradation of the idea of acoustic music insinuates she's not interested in making a whole album of Acoustics. Even her potential ballads turn into electronic-high energy songs.
She didn't degrade the idea of acoustic music, she lauded the talent it takes to make electronic music.
I don't think it's disrespectful to attack the stereotype that if you do electro-pop you're inherently less talented than/inferior to someone who primarily utilizes acoustic instrumentation.
!!!!!!!!!
I remember once Gaga saying in an interview that pop stars are not taken seriously. Which is 100% true everybody loves and respects Adele but nobody would dare call her a pop star they're going to call her a singer.
Ok but Gaga said that as if she produces her own sounds when she doesn't. Acoustic music comes from the soul, especially when done correctly, and most of the time the person singing it has written the song word for word just like she does in her electronic music, I think the comment was a tad disrespectful tbh, especially with the mention of Adele being right behind it.
That's not what she said sis. Gaga composes her own music so she knows what the hell she's talking about. She just doesn't translate her compositions onto the computer and produces them electronically the producers and her work together on that. It's not just about the song's words, they are talking about the production being more so to work with than just the composition. You try going on to FL studios and composing the number 1 smash hit from scratch, it takes a lot of work and a lot of skill.
TLDR: She's not saying either or is better, she's just saying that electronic music isn't inferior to acoustics.
To play acoustic music you need learn how to play a guitar/ piano and actually be good at it
To make electronic music all you need GarageBand Not to any that's it, but anybody can have a shot at making electronic stuff, but you need to know actual instruments to make acoustic music.
That's such a naive outlook though.
I could pick up a guitar and make music with it, even though I don't know how to play it, but that doesn't mean it wouldn't suck. The same is true for electronic music. Just because a bunch of amateurs think they can pick up GarageBand and "make cool electronic music" doesn't mean they're making good electronic music.
I see you didn't get the memo
, but I agree with what she said. And she can give facts on the matter, because she actually composes her music for both her acoustic and electronic productions.
To play acoustic music you need learn how to play a guitar/ piano and actually be good at it
To make electronic music all you need GarageBand Not to say that's it, but anybody can have a shot at making electronic stuff, but you need to know actual instruments to make acoustic music.
No. Like you said, you have to be skilled at your instrument to be able to make good sounding music. Not everyone could just pick up GarageBand and make good sounding music, just like how not everyone can just pick up a guitar and make a great album.