| |
Poll: Is Katy a touring artist now?
|
View Poll Results: Is she?
|
|
yas roar legend k
|
   
|
61 |
57.01% |
|
nah henny shes circling the drain
|
  
|
46 |
42.99% |
Member Since: 3/6/2014
Posts: 10,805
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dark_Lorde
That's not what a FORCE is bang up. A FORCE is not about the gross.
A FORCE is about a continious incline and momentum and that's what Katy has. Every tour has grossed more than the previous one. That's what a FORCE is. It's moved forward.
If an artist has only ever known a decline. If an artist's numbers have descreaed with every tour, they didn't have FORCE to take away in the first place.
|
By your logic, if some artist grosses $1m with his first tour and adds extra $1m with every tour, he is a touring force (which he is actually not)  The definitions you made up to prove your point right is hilarious 
OT: She have to wait for that title till next tour.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/7/2011
Posts: 20,627
|
Of course.
What is the argument that she isn't?
Like what makes her not?
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 15,700
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bang Up
Don't reply to me unless you have something intelligent to say.
A force is continuous success, not improving upon your success over and over again, though that obviously only adds to your "force" status. When an artist grosses hundreds of millions of dollars with one tour, it's not easy to repeat that success and not doing so does not invalidate their ability to tour and bring in big numbers.
Simply put so you can understand: When your first tour grosses $60m, you're going to improve. When your first tour grosses several hundred million, you're going to decline.
By your own definition, Madonna is not a touring force because the MDNA Tour grossed $100m less than the tour before it.  Though I'm sure you have an explanation for that. |
|
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 3/22/2012
Posts: 26,321
|
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/2/2014
Posts: 15,009
|
Yes. Queen of Tours, with an International Smile 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/14/2009
Posts: 15,174
|
Of course, she is slaying with the PWT! 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/21/2012
Posts: 4,807
|
Yes, she is.
Quote:
Originally posted by Bang Up
Don't reply to me unless you have something intelligent to say.
A force is continuous success, not improving upon your success over and over again, though that obviously only adds to your "force" status. When an artist grosses hundreds of millions of dollars with one tour, it's not easy to repeat that success and not doing so does not invalidate their ability to tour and bring in big numbers.
Simply put so you can understand: When your first tour grosses $60m, you're going to improve. When your first tour grosses several hundred million, you're going to decline.
By your own definition, Madonna is not a touring force because the MDNA Tour grossed $100m less than the tour before it. Though I'm sure you have an explanation for that. |
 clock that fagg0t!
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/3/2014
Posts: 3,992
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bang Up
Don't reply to me unless you have something intelligent to say.
A force is continuous success, not improving upon your success over and over again, though that obviously only adds to your "force" status. When an artist grosses hundreds of millions of dollars with one tour, it's not easy to repeat that success and not doing so does not invalidate their ability to tour and bring in big numbers.
Simply put so you can understand: When your first tour grosses $60m, you're going to improve. When your first tour grosses several hundred million, you're going to decline.
By your own definition, Madonna is not a touring force because the MDNA Tour grossed $100m less than the tour before it. Though I'm sure you have an explanation for that. |
the CLOCK
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 2,370
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dark Horse
Yes. Queen of Tours, with an International Smile |
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 11,555
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bang Up
Don't reply to me unless you have something intelligent to say.
A force is continuous success, not improving upon your success over and over again, though that obviously only adds to your "force" status. When an artist grosses hundreds of millions of dollars with one tour, it's not easy to repeat that success and not doing so does not invalidate their ability to tour and bring in big numbers.
Simply put so you can understand: When your first tour grosses $60m, you're going to improve. When your first tour grosses several hundred million, you're going to decline.
By your own definition, Madonna is not a touring force because the MDNA Tour grossed $100m less than the tour before it. Though I'm sure you have an explanation for that. |
Not you acting like every single musician grosses $60 million everytime they tour and it's such an easy feat 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 27,490
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bang Up
Don't reply to me unless you have something intelligent to say.
A force is continuous success, not improving upon your success over and over again, though that obviously only adds to your "force" status. When an artist grosses hundreds of millions of dollars with one tour, it's not easy to repeat that success and not doing so does not invalidate their ability to tour and bring in big numbers.
Simply put so you can understand: When your first tour grosses $60m, you're going to improve. When your first tour grosses several hundred million, you're going to decline.
By your own definition, Madonna is not a touring force because the MDNA Tour grossed $100m less than the tour before it. Though I'm sure you have an explanation for that. |
skjaopkIJAKLAAJHHJKA 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/31/2013
Posts: 9,758
|
Dead @ "nah henny she is circling the drain"
|
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 2/6/2014
Posts: 4,224
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bang Up
Don't reply to me unless you have something intelligent to say.
A force is continuous success, not improving upon your success over and over again, though that obviously only adds to your "force" status. When an artist grosses hundreds of millions of dollars with one tour, it's not easy to repeat that success and not doing so does not invalidate their ability to tour and bring in big numbers.
Simply put so you can understand: When your first tour grosses $60m, you're going to improve. When your first tour grosses several hundred million, you're going to decline.
By your own definition, Madonna is not a touring force because the MDNA Tour grossed $100m less than the tour before it. Though I'm sure you have an explanation for that. |
LOL i'll reply to you whenever I feel like it, sis.
I just love how you attempt to change the very definition of force. Force, is about moving forward.It's about momentum. That's just what force is.... You can't change that, sorry about it.
Thank you for attempting to put it simply but as usual, all you have achieved is nonsense. If, if's and but's were candy and nuts what a wonder christmas we would have.
"IF" this "BUT" that. Stop making excuse. A decline goes against the very definition for FORCE.
Now bang up, play close attention: Remember how FORCE is about momentum, Well Madonna who isn't a peer of lady gaga or Katy, she has been building momentum with her tours for 30 years. She has built momentum. She could gross 100m less or 100m more and she would still be a FORCE.
This is a very very simple concept.
Katy and gaga are at the beginning of their careers. Katy has inclined building momentum, she is a FORCE. gaga has declined she is, NOT.
Jesus, you're dumber than your fave. - Who btw I must correct myself when I said she was at the beginning of her career. She's at the end. 
|
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 2/6/2014
Posts: 4,224
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Kayhan
By your logic, if some artist grosses $1m with his first tour and adds extra $1m with every tour, he is a touring force (which he is actually not) The definitions you made up to prove your point right is hilarious
OT: She have to wait for that title till next tour. |
I explain it (again LOL) for the simple minded - Above
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/28/2012
Posts: 34,863
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bang Up
By your own definition, Madonna is not a touring force because the MDNA Tour grossed $100m less than the tour before it. Though I'm sure you have an explanation for that. |
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/2/2014
Posts: 8,759
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dark_Lorde
That's not what a FORCE is bang up. A FORCE is not about the gross.
A FORCE is about a continious incline and momentum and that's what Katy has. Every tour has grossed more than the previous one. That's what a FORCE is. It's moved forward.
If an artist has only ever known a decline. If an artist's numbers have descreaed with every tour, they didn't have FORCE to take away in the first place.
|
Quote:
Originally posted by SupahBass05
I mean, if she outsold a "touring force's" entire tour with just one NA leg, you can't really argue that she isn't one  |
destroy them 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 25,504
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dark_Lorde
She has always been a touring force.
The term FORCE is all about moving forward. Katy has only ever inclined.
It's the very definition for the word. (in this context)
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 3/9/2012
Posts: 4,903
|
she is. at monsters running in here
keep it cool kidz
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 3,183
|
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 3,043
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dark_Lorde
LOL i'll reply to you whenever I feel like it, sis.
I just love how you attempt to change the very definition of force. Force, is about moving forward.It's about momentum. That's just what force is.... You can't change that, sorry about it.
Thank you for attempting to put it simply but as usual, all you have achieved is nonsense. If, if's and but's were candy and nuts what a wonder christmas we would have.
"IF" this "BUT" that. Stop making excuse. A decline goes against the very definition for FORCE.
Now bang up, play close attention: Remember how FORCE is about momentum, Well Madonna who isn't a peer of lady gaga or Katy, she has been building momentum with her tours for 30 years. She has built momentum. She could gross 100m less or 100m more and she would still be a FORCE.
This is a very very simple concept.
Katy and gaga are at the beginning of their careers. Katy has inclined building momentum, she is a FORCE. gaga has declined she is, NOT.
Jesus, you're dumber than your fave. - Who btw I must correct myself when I said she was at the beginning of her career. She's at the end. |
Do yourself and ATRL a favor, stop with your crap. You're just embarrassing yourself, but that's nothing new I suppose. 
But yes, it's about time we set high standards for Katy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
