[ToLove]

Originally posted by FAME.

Nope. There is nothing worse than endangering and ruining the lives of innocent children (ie, holding them hostage, driving with them on your lap with no seat belt, dropping them and pretty much scarring them for life etc.)

Beating a grown woman > being a child endangerer
Murdering a grown man > being a child endagerer
Robbing a grown woman > being a child endangerer
Going to jail for all of those things combined > being a child endangerer

The lengths Chris Brown fans go to defend him...

And sweetie, there's a reason why Chris has been imprisoned and sentenced multiple times while Britney has never set foot in a prison cell. Unlike Chris, there is NO evidence that Britney is a child endangerer.

Aside from that one incident where she drove with her son on her lap, she's done nothing to pose a threat to her kids, whereas Chris beat the living crap out of Rihanna and also physically abused Frank Ocean and multiple women with incriminating evidence (hence him being thrown back behind bars this year).

But yeah, making one mistake is worse than robbery, abuse, and murder combined (according to Chris Brown fans at least).

[ezra]

Independant Woman is actually a really good song.

Too bad it's not a beyonce song. DC >> beyucki alone

[ezra]

not the stans of these two horribly evil people (child abusers and woman beaters) going head to head in here

[GreasyBruce]

"Endangerer" is not a word

[FAME.]

Originally posted by ezra

not the stans of these two horribly evil people (child abusers and woman beaters) going head to head in here

We are. But am not sure why.
At the end of the day crimes against children are always and undeniably worse than any other kind of crimes. There is nothing more criminal than being a ****** mother. (except for maybe being a child molester, but again that has to do with something against children)

[Poe Dameron]

Originally posted by GreasyBruce

"Endangerer" is not a word

[GreasyBruce]

Originally posted by Giselle

Britney stans do weird (make up lives on ATRL) and gross (anal sex, often in public restrooms) things just like her so I can understand why they would think you have to share the same ideas and values as your fave.

Homophobic!

And sad @ people missing out on their full sexual enjoyment.

[ToLove]

Again, I love how the Army is accused of living in the past for bringing up old receipts, but apparently, saying that she endangers her kids is fine being brought up even though she's done absolutely nothing worth worrying about regarding her kids in 8 years.

[GreasyBruce]

Ok sorry, I think it is a word actually. It just sounds really weird to me, like there should be another word to describe it better. Anyway, carry on.

[FAME.]

Originally posted by ToLove

The lengths Chris Brown fans go to defend him...

And sweetie, there's a reason why Chris has been imprisoned and sentenced multiple times while Britney has never set foot in a prison cell. Unlike Chris, there is NO evidence that Britney is a child endangerer.

Aside from that one incident where she drove with her son on her lap, she's done nothing to pose a threat to her kids, whereas Chris beat the living crap out of Rihanna and also physically abused Frank Ocean and multiple women with incriminating evidence (hence him being thrown back behind bars this year).

But yeah, making one mistake is worse than robbery, abuse, and murder combined (according to Chris Brown fans at least).

Again, the reason why Britney hasn't got convicted has more to do with her lack of mental capacity than lack of evidence. There is literal photo proof of her abusing and endangering the lives of her children on multiple occasions. I'm sorry Chris is mentally capable enough to be held accountable for his actions (which regardless aren't anywhere near as bad as abusing children anyway)

[Clump]

Originally posted by Giselle

Britney stans do weird (make up lives on ATRL) and gross (anal sex, often in public restrooms) things just like her so I can understand why they would think you have to share the same ideas and values as your fave.

And what kind of sex are you having, Giselle?

[Poe Dameron]

Beyonce could saying something homophobic and her fans would probably defend her

[Lord Blackout]

Ugh I woke up with The Story Of Loose looping in my head. Lorde help me

Originally posted by GoddessofLove

Beyonce could saying something homophobic and her fans would probably defend her

She doesn't have the brain capacity to come up with something

[aayAlex]

Originally posted by Giselle

Britney stans do weird (make up lives on ATRL) and gross (anal sex, often in public restrooms) things just like her so I can understand why they would think you have to share the same ideas and values as your fave.

[ezra]

Originally posted by FAME.

We are. But am not sure why.
At the end of the day crimes against children are always and undeniably worse than any other kind of crimes. There is nothing more criminal than being a ****** mother. (except for maybe being a child molester, but again that has to do with something against children)

the fact this is what it has to come to with britney fans

anyway I don't really hold anything against fist anymore. rihanna doesn't why should I?

[FAME.]

Originally posted by ToLove

she's done absolutely nothing worth worrying about regarding her kids in 8 years.

Except for the fact that they have had numerous men in and out of their lives since, which is extremely unhealthy and damaging (as if the abuse they've suffered at her hands 8 years prior wasn't more than enough)

Not that the time span of when said abuse occurred is relevant anyway because that doesn't make it okay regardless.

[Ozzy8923]

Originally posted by Giselle

Britney stans do weird (make up lives on ATRL) and gross (anal sex, often in public restrooms) things just like her so I can understand why they would think you have to share the same ideas and values as your fave.

The Hive takes pride and constantly laud Beyonce's feminist efforts (including you). That is one value (ONE not ALL values) that she and her stans share. Simple as that.

I'm pointing out the (valid) discrepancies between this and the way they treat another female artist.

Originally posted by FAME.

The reason Britney isn't a convicted criminal is because she is so ******* crazy and literally remedial that it is almost immoral to hold her accountable for her disgusting actions.

None of that changes the fact that she has endangered the lives of innocent children on multiple occasions. Which is worse than anything, except for maybe raping them.

There is certainly enough to convict her though...if she was a regular mentally equipped person that is. Holding your children hostage against police is without a doubt illegal. As is driving with a newborn baby on your lap.

Where is the PROOF? You have ONE picture of a child on her lap (the horror) and one of her stumbling on a rocky road.

We have this

Once again, can't say someone 'ruined the lives of innocent children during their key development stages' when there is no such proof.

And if Britney's mental instability makes it enough to NOT hold her accountable for her (alleged) actions under the United States of America court of law, then, I suppose a mere ATRL member can't do the same. Be gone.

[ezra]

Originally posted by Clump

And what kind of sex are you having, Giselle?

not vaginal!

[GreasyBruce]

Originally posted by FAME.

Except for the fact that they have had numerous men in and out of their lives since, which is extremely unhealthy and damaging (as if the abuse they've suffered at her hands 8 years prior wasn't more than enough)

Not that the time span of when said abuse occurred is relevant anyway because that doesn't make it okay regardless.

She's had three boyfriends in the last 7 years Her children are happier and have a brighter future than anybody in this thread

[Poe Dameron]

Originally posted by Lord Blackout

Ugh I woke up with The Story Of Loose looping in my head. Lorde help me



She doesn't have the brain capacity to come up with something

I'm sure she could turn to her husband for some help

In his debut album “Reasonable Doubt,” released in 1996, he rapped: “Too manny ****** ****** clocking my spending” in the song “22 Two’s.”

His second album, “Vol. 2… Hard Knock Life,” brought us the gem of a song “***** What, ***** Who (Originator ’99)” where he says that when “******s wanna talk to Po-Po’s,” he would “smoke em like cocoa.” Either Jay-Z does not want gays talking to the police, or he believes anyone talking to law enforcement must be homosexual. In the song “Gangsta ****,” he leans toward the latter possibility: “His little ****** in the corner calling 911.”

Here are some other notable lyrics from Jay-Z’s discography:

“What you gay? ***** Jay straight like Indian hair” – From “2 Many Hoes”
“And since you infatuated with sayin’ tha gay ****” – From “Super Ugly”
“Had ****** mad for real like ‘I wish he was gay’”- From “Hey Papi”
“Hate a ***** like that ******, get your own”- From “Lucky Me”
“That’s gay, I ain’t into liking dudes no way”- From “La La La (Excuse Me Again)”
So why the sudden endorsement of the president’s newfound “evolved” opinion? As he said in his first album, it’s just “politics as usual.”

http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/15/g-...ad-his-lyrics/