Quote:
Originally posted by WalkingOnCharts
And the opinion switch to "performers have nothing to do with ratings" begins! Interesting.
|
Quote:
Originally posted by CarterTax
No point. The hive said that people only tune in for the game and the performers don't matter  |
THAT WAS NOT(!) the point. We said as in here
http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?t=945979
THAT the core viewership of the game decides whether it will be the most watched or not.
cause if one game has 110 million viewers and another 118 million, then there is no point in comparing them.
LET ME QUOTE YOUR POST IN MY THREAD CAUSE two days ago you thought Samuel's post was hot fresh TEA
Quote:
Originally posted by Samuel
Obviously the majority of the viewers are for the game. But when the performance had more views than the game itself (as in Katy's case) that suggests that those that tuned in to watch the game cared enough about the performance and were entertained enough to keep them from changing the channel. PLUS even more people tuned in just to see the halftime show. This is certainly something to brag about!
|
Quote:
Originally posted by WalkingOnCharts
|
Quote:
Originally posted by KingB®
Guys! This is not about roasting any fan base though
Yes, that is of course something you could be proud of.
|
and CALCULATED
