[LightandDarkness]

I like Ke$ha, but NO I wouldn't sign her! She's mostly a single's artist and doesn't have international appeal.

[JoaoP]

Yes.
the girl is making money.

[TakeItOff!]

No.

[Patrick]

Absolutely.

[Peep]

Cheryl: Yes.

Ke$ha: No.
Well, maybe I'd let her suck **** at some producers I would need for my other artists. I would just have her release singles and EPs with 3 tracks consisting of only singles.

[XChrisX]

Absolutely!.............................NO.

[TakeItOff!]

Originally posted by Peep

Cheryl: Yes.

Ke$ha: No.
Well, maybe I'd let her suck **** at some producers I would need for my other artists. I would just have her release singles and EPs with 3 tracks consisting of only singles.

[RileyFreeman]

Would I sign Ke$ha?

Oh GOD no...

[-Alfie-]

I'd sign her as a producer/songwriter/demo girl then when she's done with a track I would give it to someone else on the label.

[DWG]

Cheryl: Yes.

I mean, what would the world be without Cheryl GIFs?



Ke$ha: Also yes. The girl can write and I like her voice.

[D/X]

Yes.

[Jakor]

I'm not sure... I think not.

[Disturbia]

No.

I don't like her oice, her lyrics are dumb and she can't sell worldwide

[Chrïs.]

Money is made by album sales,so no.

[Chunk]

Everyone who wouldn't sign her is crazy.

She makes great pop music, has a good voice and makes money like a cash cow

[SarahWalker]

For sure.

Because I like her. Even if I don't, she's getting those top 10s effortlessly without much promotion, lots of $$$$$$$ for me

[Vashetti]

No.

[MrCookiepants]

No. And I'd be doing the world a big favor.

[Michael]

You're the owner of a music label, would you sign the following artist?:

will.i.am



Give reasons for your choice - why would you / wouldn't you sign the artist?

Discuss.

[Duca]

Hell to the ****ing no.