Quote:
Originally posted by Moonchild
A former Secretary of State, Senator and First Lady with the backing of two living Presidents is not a weak frontrunner. Especially against Trump.  |
1) You're assuming Trump is going to be the NOM. That's not set in stone yet.
2) Kerry and Gore lost against Bush. They were certainly just as qualified as Hilary is and way more popular. They still lost.
3) American voters are stupid and lazy: See the Senate and the House. See Arnold Schwarzewhatever.
4) Hillary is a walking negative AD with Benghazi and her use of a personal email
5) Again, she's unfavorable as hell which could result in voters staying home or voting for whoever the GOP nominee is
Her status as "weak" is not with regard to her experience, it's about her standing with the voters. And none of you can tell me a frontrunner with higher negative numbers than any candidate in history is in a "strong" position come November.
on a daily basis. Hillary isn't stupid and she sure as hell will never let Bernie set the terms on when and where they will debate 
The stereotype of the old, white population voting en masse and holding up the voter count despite the multicultural majority is true. Many of them are barely opening up to the idea of being loose with social issues so good luck having them suddenly vote far-left.
(weaker than 2008 but somehow still winning). What I don't like is his reasoning for calling her weak.
. While I do love Hillary (a lot) I can think of a few others on her level who I like just as much that aren't always entangled in some mess 
