[Benzene]

Bernie fans thinking his results in caucus states can be replicated in diverse primaries.

[Benzene]

Originally posted by King Maxx

All of this is outdated except Wisconsin and New York.

Bernie ain't winning MD, PA, DE, and likely not CT. I don't need polls to know this tbh. Demography has beem very consistent in picking the winner.

[TurntUp]

But I do hope she can pull a W in Wisconsin to stop his momentum. It will be close just like Missouri and Iowa and Illinois

[Orpheus]

I hate that we have to wait 9 days until the next polls. FML.

Originally posted by TurntUp

But I do hope she can pull a W in Wisconsin to stop his momentum. It will be close just like Missouri and Iowa and Illinois

Yeah, just getting a victory, no matter how big or small, will help change the narrative. She needs to get to work.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by TurntUp

But I do hope she can pull a W in Wisconsin to stop his momentum. It will be close just like Missouri and Iowa and Illinois

**** Wisconsin. Though a victory there would surely help

And @Orpheus the wait between Wisconsin and New York will be the worst . (Not even factoring in Wyoming)

[Sasha.]

alaska, washington and hawaii are like 99% white so definitely bernie-leaning demographics. he has no chance outside the über-white states.

[Benzene]

Originally posted by Sasha.

alaska, washington and hawaii are like 99% white so definitely bernie-leaning demographics. he has no chance outside the über-white states.

Hawaii is actually mostly Asian. But caucuses tend to be whiter than the general electorate, so you're right about that.

As for the narrative, there isn't even that much coverage of this outside of US Uncut and the like. Sanders will get a fundraising boost but the narrative hasn't really changed. It will only change if Hillary loses New York.

[RatedG²]

When's the next republican contest?

[Benzene]

Originally posted by RatedG²

When's the next republican contest?

Wisconsin on the same day.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by Benzene

Wisconsin on the same day.

Why the **** is Wisconsin so damn important

[Monster Megamind]

Originally posted by RatedG²

Why the **** is Wisconsin so damn important

Whichever has more delegates is important

[TurntUp]

I know Hill is comfortable with her lead and is saving money for the GE but she shouldn't let these be blowouts. She still needs to advertise and be in the game. I hope she's doing adds and is all over Wisconsin

[Wafflecakes]

Originally posted by TurntUp

I know Hill is comfortable with her lead and is saving money for the GE but she shouldn't let these be blowouts. She still needs to advertise and be in the game. I hope she's doing adds and is all over Wisconsin

Caucus's are a shitshow. There is nothing she can do about them.

[Benzene]

Originally posted by TurntUp

I know Hill is comfortable with her lead and is saving money for the GE but she shouldn't let these be blowouts. She still needs to advertise and be in the game. I hope she's doing adds and is all over Wisconsin

She was trashed in caucuses in 2008 too. Just not for her. She should have her money.

Sanders outspent her big in states like SC, OH, and AZ and still got rocked. 3-1 outspending in Michigan only pulled hm even. Mess @ Sanders proving that money can't buy elections, the irony.

[D_Man3379]

Hillary is wise on not spending money/time on caucuses states. It's not worth it.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by Monster Megamind

Whichever has more delegates is important

It's WTA on the republican side and on the democratic side it's one of the only states where she can stop the Bern. It's important for such an...unknown state relatively speaking

[@michael]

Originally posted by D_Man3379

Hillary is wise on not spending money/time on caucuses states. It's not worth it.

So true. Why throw millions of dollars at Washington so she can lose 40-60 instead of 25-70? What difference, at this point, does it make?

[Benzene]

Originally posted by @michael

So true. Why throw millions of dollars at Washington so she can lose 40-60 instead of 25-70? What difference, at this point, does it make?

She was so worried about WA, HI, and AK that she spent a grand total of $54,000.

[Benzene]

Hillary will have to spend in New York, though. Bernie "Clean Campaign" Sanders is planning to go scorched Earth on her, and he'll have a whole 2 weeks to do it with nothing else.

Not sure that's great strategy in a closed primary but hey, not my campaign.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...d0a_story.html

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by Benzene

Hillary will have to spend in New York, though. Bernie "Clean Campaign" Sanders is planning to go scorched Earth on her, and he'll have a whole 2 weeks to do it with nothing else.

Not sure that's great strategy in a closed primary but hey, not my campaign.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...d0a_story.html

Smh. Good luck cutting into her 48 point lead I guess

The good thing is that there are only 3 caucuses left so he'll need to start doing well in primaries but for the most part he's getting romped harder than Obama in them (while doing less well in caucuses than Obama).