Quote:
Originally posted by timtincher
Even though I am a Bionic stan, what happened with Lotus? Couldn't he promote her latest effort instead?
Mess @ this whole thing. 
That Gagz obsession won't let up. |
lol the idea is that either Gaga's label paid Perez to spread hatred about Bionic since they all copy each other (notice how they all report the same thing about Gaga/Perez drama? Not a coincidence, journalism is dying) or Gaga straight up asked him to do it for kicks and giggles. Perez's blog was a Gaga shrine at the time he was decimating Christina constantly from 2008-2010. He "coined" the name "floptina" and "xeroxtina" that is still thrown around constantly. Since someone (we can only guess Gaga's label) paid for ads that compared Gaga and declared her the "better Christina" during KGB that linked to her iTunes page, it's kind of suspicious. And DJs would straight up say they wouldn't play NMT because "they already have Gaga" (KIIS-FM).
So the idea is that Bionic was the one who got such a significantly bad rap due to the power of the media, not Lotus. Lotus was just lazy. KGB and Bionic (at the beginning of Bionic, at least) were definitely not lazy eras. And thus "justice for Bionic and it's stolen sales". It was the most downloaded record of 2010, too. Lotus wasn't.
He needs to just shut up though or post some actually incriminating evidence, otherwise we can just conclude that Gaga's sketch (as previously known, miss broadcasts a streaming link of her song to play 150x straight) and Perez is just trying to take advantage of the situation. But no one cares to listen because he's such a d*ck.
Bill Werde (Billboard) said Perez has quite a big influence with the 20 somethings, although he's been seriously compromising it the past few months. Namely because everyone knows he was Gaga's bitch for a long time and now suddenly pretending that he doesn't have power over what he posts. Karmaaaa
My fav FF9 character tbh. Maybe I eat it? 
