[STMG23]

Originally posted by r0bz_

62 million dollars is a hit and you will deal!

No, it's not considering procuction alone did cost 55 million. distribution and marketing is not for free either and usually you can count half of production budget for that.

You can repest that it's a hit over and over again but Sony/Screen Gems will still not have made a profit. Not saying it won't but right now the theatrical gross is not a hit. Deal!

[r0bz_]

Originally posted by STMG23

No, it's not considering procuction alone did cost 55 million. distribution and marketing is not for free either and usually you can count half of production budget for that.

You can repest that it's a hit over and over again but Sony/Screen Gems will still not have made a profit. Not saying it won't but right now the theatrical gross is not a hit. Deal!

Eh you are inflating and making up numbers because you are pressed. You need to deal with 63 million dollars being an epic success and move on. This is the best film of the year.

[STMG23]

Originally posted by r0bz_

Eh you are inflating and making up numbers because you are pressed. You need to deal with 63 million dollars being an epic success and move on. This is the best film of the year.

How am I pressed? Which numbers have I inflated or made up?

If you make a movie for 55 million dollars you will market it accordingly (big).

I did not even state a marketing budget, I only said that often you can guess it's half of production budget.

[.::Andreita::.]

Originally posted by SwagLikeALegend

SMHYB #2 New Zealand iTunes!!!!!

Cool!!!

[Ghandi]

Originally posted by STMG23

How am I pressed? Which numbers have I inflated or made up?

If you make a movie for 55 million dollars you will market it accordingly (big).

I did not even state a marketing budget, I only said that often you can guess it's half of production budget.

I think if it had a $1 first week he'd say it was a hit.

[Inception]

Originally posted by Ghandi

I think if it had a $1 first week he'd say it was a hit.

I think if it had made more than like 20 or 30 million dollars first week, you would still say it was a flop. That's how trolls like you 'work'.

[STMG23]

No, if it did 25 million first weekend and performed the same pace it did, it would have made back its budget in the US alone.

It's not hard. If the gross matches the budget, you break even and strat making profit.

Sure, we don't know how much they spent on advertising the movie but assuming it was more than 8 million dollars, we can say it has still not made back its budget and still not made a profit. Therefor you cannot call it a commercial hit.

And again: I AM NOT CALLING BURLESQUE A FLOP! But right now it's not a hit either.

[Ivan_brit]

24. Soundtrack - Burlesque
RCA - 34.000 - Largest Sales Increase



http://www.mediatraffic.de/albums-week04-2011.htm


The albu is doing good i think that this soundtrack is probably arround 400k-500k world wide

[SwagLikeALegend]

Originally posted by STMG23

No, it's not considering procuction alone did cost 55 million. distribution and marketing is not for free either and usually you can count half of production budget for that.

You can repest that it's a hit over and over again but Sony/Screen Gems will still not have made a profit. Not saying it won't but right now the theatrical gross is not a hit. Deal!

The makeup collections alone made back the marketing budget. So shut up.

[Nadia]

Originally posted by Ain'tNoOtherStan

I think if it had made more than like 20 or 30 million dollars first week, you would still say it was a flop. That's how trolls like you 'work'.

better tell 'em

[SwagLikeALegend]

Originally posted by Ain'tNoOtherStan

I think if it had made more than like 20 or 30 million dollars first week, you would still say it was a flop. That's how trolls like you 'work'.

YASSSS drag these wigs.

[lestat111]

Originally posted by STMG23

No, it's not considering procuction alone did cost 55 million. distribution and marketing is not for free either and usually you can count half of production budget for that.

You can repest that it's a hit over and over again but Sony/Screen Gems will still not have made a profit. Not saying it won't but right now the theatrical gross is not a hit. Deal!

are you workin @ screen gems? well, no. so, stop making things up. you have no idea about hit/miss, and we dont need your judgment.

[STMG23]

But its reported budget is 55 million, right?

It has grossed 63 million WORLDWIDE as of now?

If you think, they made a profit, you are an idiot.

[Inception]

Originally posted by STMG23

No, if it did 25 million first weekend and performed the same pace it did, it would have made back its budget in the US alone.

It's not hard. If the gross matches the budget, you break even and strat making profit.

Sure, we don't know how much they spent on advertising the movie but assuming it was more than 8 million dollars, we can say it has still not made back its budget and still not made a profit. Therefor you cannot call it a commercial hit.

And again: I AM NOT CALLING BURLESQUE A FLOP! But right now it's not a hit either.

Sure, it's not a 'hit' per se, but it is having success. It already has made 63 million dollars worldwide and there's still more than 30 countries (I believe) to be released in. It has surpassed MANY people's expectations, and that's why we, fans, are so happy with these numbers. Because they are great. And just to think that those numbers will increase EVEN more is very satisfying to hear.

I really understand what you are trying to say, and I know you don't dislike Christina judging by your previous posts, but many movies don't make back their budget only by what they gross on the boxoffice. Like SwagLikeALegend said, there's products that they're selling as well, like that make-up stuff, that apparently, from what I've read, are being quite a success too. And then, there will be the movie release, its sales and rents, so I'm pretty sure it will be a big profit for the studio.

[CΔrLøS]

AintNoOtherStan

[zach]

Originally posted by Ghandi

I think if it had a $1 first week he'd say it was a hit.

You are such a closet stan!

Thanks for checking up on it every so often.

[R`0`K`R]

Originally posted by Ghandi

I think if it had a $1 first week he'd say it was a hit.

Originally posted by Ain'tNoOtherStan

I think if it had made more than like 20 or 30 million dollars first week, you would still say it was a flop. That's how trolls like you 'work'.

PWN3D!!

[r0bz_]

Originally posted by Ghandi

I think if it had a $1 first week he'd say it was a hit.

You are only here to troll. The haters are mad they dont really have anything to back up their flop claims. 63 million dollars SO FAR doesnt lie. The movie is a success and you will continue to troll this thread for no reason.

[r0bz_]

Originally posted by STMG23

But its reported budget is 55 million, right?

It has grossed 63 million WORLDWIDE as of now?

If you think, they made a profit, you are an idiot.

And you are reported! enjoy your warning points!

[EdicsonHades]

The trolls...