I've donated 20 dollars to Bernie and 100 something dollars to Hillary.
I've donated a little more than that to my local Secretary of State, Jason Kander, since he will be running against one of my senators, Roy Blunt, and could potentially have a chance of winning. I want that unanimous Democrat 2017.
Missouri! I like Kander, hopefully he can take out Blunt despite how Red Missouri has become.
Bernie's big wins tonight are gonna be totally overshadowed by Brussels
I've spoken to several people about the primaries and everyone has been acting like Hillary is already the nomination... Has anyone else noticed this? Also the delegates earned tonight are going to be close tonight since Hillary will win AZ
What exactly did he say she lied about under oath?
And while no sitting president was actually under investigation, there have been plenty of lies republican presidents have said. Richard Nixon was such a crook who was a republican who "basically" lied under oath (he resigned before he could be tried but insisted he didn't lie to the people)
I can't remember for sure, something about saying something in a released email that contradicts what she said under oath about Benghazi.
Quote:
Originally posted by Retro
Hillary has never actually lied under oath
I tried googling to find this stuff out, but literally the first few pages of Google are all websites saying she lied.. I know media is biased though, I would just love solid, concrete evidence I can throw back at them next time they try and tell me she lied under oath. Do you have a link or anything supporting the fact that she never lied under oath?
I hate to say it, but terrorist attacks like the ones today in Belgium, help Trump. The more of these events that happen, the more that US voters will likely be scared or concerned about similar tragedies happening in the US. Trump has been very tough on Muslim immigration and his message tapping into fears about what that will bring will only be strengthened by today's events.
Am I the only one that finds this video desperately hilarious?
Why is he lying about viewing figures? He says his channel has more than 5 million subs. It only has 2.7m subs. Also TYT is much smaller online than the likes of CNN, Yahoo, FoxNews, Buzzfeed, WashingtonPost.com and MSN News. Sanders is obviously spending his media- time with the biggest media outlets in the US because he is not an idiot. If he wanted to do interviews with youtubers, he could just get interviewed by Pewdiepie with his 42m subs.
CNN gets 97m hits a day (according to Nielsen). TYT has their most popular video having 27m views over 6 years. At that was for a video about a woman having 300 orgasms in a day, so one with a sexual element to it, as opposed to a political one. That guy on TYT is dramatically overstating the influence of his youtube channel.
I hate to say it, but terrorist attacks like the ones today in Belgium, help Trump. The more of these events that happen, the more that US voters will likely be scared or concerned about similar tragedies happening in the US. Trump has been very tough on Muslim immigration and his message tapping into fears about what that will bring will only be strengthened by today's events.
I was thinking that as well. But people don't seem to realize that this will only hurt foreign policies. Americans are so stupid to even realize that. Trump won't do it so then all of his supporters will be like wtf
I'm on a recurring donation of $35.50 a month; yes, I added the extra fifty cents Total, I've probably donated about $300 or so. Normally after a good debate where I get hyped, I donate money. I was a struggling college student during her last run with Obama, but I gave both of their campaigns about $50 each.
I can't remember for sure, something about saying something in a released email that contradicts what she said under oath about Benghazi.
I tried googling to find this stuff out, but literally the first few pages of Google are all websites saying she lied.. I know media is biased though, I would just love solid, concrete evidence I can throw back at them next time they try and tell me she lied under oath. Do you have a link or anything supporting the fact that she never lied under oath?
Your response should be, "I'm sorry, lied under oath? When was she arrested for perjury? In the United States, you aren't guilty till proven innocent, you're innocent till proven guilty."
All the sites you had come up are all conspiracy theorists outlining their beliefs of why they think she is a liar or has perjured herself. Fact is, she has yet to be arrested for committing perjury or charged with similar offenses, which is basically lying or falsifying info under oath. The ones that should be providing proof is them. You can say stuff till you're blue in the face, but where are the charges? They may talk about corrupt politicians and money, but if you're going to make damaging claims like this, make sure it sticks and is 100% accurate.
Don't the majority of Americans trust Clinton when it comes to foreign policy? I know the far left criticizes her decisions but isn't the overwhelming opinion that she was a great Secretary of State?
Don't the majority of Americans trust Clinton when it comes to foreign policy? I know the far left criticizes her decisions but isn't the overwhelming opinion that she was a great Secretary of State?
It's beyond amusing to me. At the end of her service as Secretary of State, Hillary was praised on both sides as one of the best Secretaries we've ever had. Foreign leaders had renewed faith and trust in the American Government once again after it was severely diminished during George W. Bush's Administration. Videos of Trump, Lindsey Graham, and Carly Fiorina were praising her for the work she did.
They only turned on her and went back to beating her with a stick when they started remembering she'll be a frontrunner in 2016 for the Presidency. Benghazi became their new go to conspiracy to beat her down again. Then came the emails. It's like Hillary says often, the Republican work well with her in congress and outside of congress, but when she runs for something, that whole thing is forgotten. It's odd, but I get it. I don't agree with it, but I understand.
The biggest for concern some have of her is that she's "Hawkish" as they say. The no fly zone comment she made about Syria rubbed some the wrong way. The vote for the Iraq War still follows her 14 years later, while folks like Joe Biden gets a pass for it. Joe also had voted for the '94 Crime Bill, yet Hillary still gets heat for support of the bill. With the Clintons, some just love to hate them, rather it's justified or not.
Don't the majority of Americans trust Clinton when it comes to foreign policy? I know the far left criticizes her decisions but isn't the overwhelming opinion that she was a great Secretary of State?
It's beyond amusing to me. At the end of her service as Secretary of State, Hillary was praised on both sides as one of the best Secretaries we've ever had. Foreign leaders had renewed faith and trust in the American Government once again after it was severely diminished during George W. Bush's Administration. Videos of Trump, Lindsey Graham, and Carly Fiorina were praising her for the work she did.
They only turned on her and went back to beating her with a stick when they started remembering she'll be a frontrunner in 2016 for the Presidency. Benghazi became their new go to conspiracy to beat her down again. Then came the emails. It's like Hillary says often, the Republican work well with her in congress and outside of congress, but when she runs for something, that whole thing is forgotten. It's odd, but I get it. I don't agree with it, but I understand.
What really bothers me is that some of the radical lefties out there, with whom I would normally agree on many other things, try to criticize her sharply on her Secretary of State tenure solely because of their Bernie Bias. I understand those that disagree fundamentally with her performance or positions, but the bias becomes irritating when it becomes a detriment to reasonable judgment.
Don't the majority of Americans trust Clinton when it comes to foreign policy? I know the far left criticizes her decisions but isn't the overwhelming opinion that she was a great Secretary of State?
I know media is biased though, I would just love solid, concrete evidence I can throw back at them next time they try and tell me she lied under oath. Do you have a link or anything supporting the fact that she never lied under oath?
