[retromaury]

Originally posted by Retro

Aside from the fact that the video won't even open for me, saying that Hillary haters DON'T think logically about her isn't a personal attack at all. It's all just emotion, fed by propaganda leveled against her for the last 25 years.

She's never been indicted. She's never outright lied. She's singled out for policy changes because she's a woman when plenty of her opponents have flipped without criticism. She's held to standards that humans simply cannot achieve. These are facts, and that's all I need to say, because no amount of propaganda trying to skew things against her can refute the simple truth that there's no evidence of unethical or shady behavior on her part.

Thank you!

And when she went before congress and they drilled her for 11 hours she was able to hold her own and they didn't break her.

[Retro]

Originally posted by Dämon

Yeah, no! There's.
But it'd be wasting time to debate w/ Hillary stans. Been there, done that.

No. And I don't even see it as a matter of opinion; there is factually no reason to hate her, as a politician or a person.

Certainly not when we have people like Trump to compare her with, that much should be evident to anyone.

[Qwerty1234]

RETRO, go create a topic in Base for Clinton in which only her supporters are allowed to say "pretty nice things about her" alright.

---


Interesting article on the New York Times website today. Clinton/Trumps winning VOTES but not hearts. And look at that, voters, whom she NEEDS, are still labelling her as "dishonest" and "untrustworthy".

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/us...9941E7&gwt=pay

Seems like you got some refuting to do all over the damn country, lol.

[Retro]

I'll say all my "nice things" (to which you may otherwise refer as "the truth") here, in the appropriate venue.

Hillary Clinton is one of the most qualified Presidential candidates in the history of the United States and I can't wait until she's elected because she's the best candidate.

Oh, also, voters can be objectively wrong about things which they perceive to be matters of opinion - like trustworthiness and honesty.

[Mickey]

Originally posted by Dämon

Yeah, no! There's.
But it'd be wasting time to debate w/ Hillary stans. Been there, done that.

It sounds like you've already made up your mind

[Venus Temple]

Y'all seriously, how do I rebut this?

https://www.facebook.com/GOP/videos/10153876690020090/

[foxaylove]

Originally posted by foxaylove

People always say this, but there are some that have stated if Trump is the nominee, they're voting for Hillary. During the Iowa Debate, they interviewed a woman in a bar full of people watching, she stated she was going to vote Dem for the first time in support of Hillary because she was disappointed with the options in her party. Then you had the Super Tuesday interview of the room full of people in the El Paso region where they asked if Trump won, would they vote for him or look into 3rd party/Hillary as an option. A few said Hillary while others said third party option. To say no GOP supporters won't crossover is a bit too much. There will be plenty. The question is how bad with the third party options hurt Trump or Hillary.

Roszka vents about how Clinton’s handling of the Benghazi attacks was disgraceful, her feminism is phony and her ambition is off-putting.

“She wants to be elected at all costs,” said Roszka, a 63-year-old from suburban Detroit who often votes Republican, as she did in last week’s primary.

Yet Roszka says when she votes in November, it will very likely be for Clinton.

“If the election is close and looks like Donald Trump could be president, there are Republican women who will say, ‘I can’t believe I am saying this, but I am going to vote for Hillary Clinton,’” said Christine Matthews, whose firm specializes in helping Republicans target women.

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-n...316-story.html

[Marvin]

Originally posted by Retro

She's never outright lied.

Originally posted by Venus Temple

Y'all seriously, how do I rebut this?

https://www.facebook.com/GOP/videos/10153876690020090/

Was that not a lie?

It'd be nice if you guys took off the stan glasses for just a minute and realized that there are legitimate reasons to dislike Hillary, whether you agree with them or not.

I mean... you guys hate hate Bernie for stating facts about Castro but see no problem with Hillary and her lies.

[RihRihGirrrl]

I'm not even a big Hillary supporter (voted for Obama) but how is she any more or less a 'liar' than any other politician? You could literally make a compilation of any politician flip flopping or changing their positions

[HeyMr.DJ]

Originally posted by Qwerty1234

RETRO, go create a topic in Base for Clinton in which only her supporters are allowed to say "pretty nice things about her" alright.

---


Interesting article on the New York Times website today. Clinton/Trumps winning VOTES but not hearts. And look at that, voters, whom she NEEDS, are still labelling her as "dishonest" and "untrustworthy".

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/us...9941E7&gwt=pay

Seems like you got some refuting to do all over the damn country, lol.

Is that why she's leading EVERY candidate in popular votes (and it's not even close). She's beating Donald trump nearly 2-1 in votes and she's up by 2.5 million votes against sanders. She has plenty of supporters who love and trust her. I'd know, I'm part of her Maryland campaign team honey.

[Reza]

Originally posted by alexanderao

NYT has him at 661.

MSNBC has him at 666. a satan teas

[Tinker]

Originally posted by vamp

Trump has 666 delegates.

Omg. He's truly the devil himself.

[heckinglovato]

The race is virtually over on the Democratic side, I completely admire Bernie for bringing forth a true leftist agenda and shaking things up towards the left. Truly hoping he files for a Senate run or gets a Cabinet position.

Officially endorsing Secretary Clinton for President.

[@michael]

Bernie Sanders Had a Phenomenal Night — Here’s Why

[@michael]

Originally posted by heckinglovato

The race is virtually over on the Democratic side, I completely admire Bernie for bringing forth a true leftist agenda and shaking things up towards the left. Truly hoping he files for a Senate run or gets a Cabinet position.

Officially endorsing Secretary Clinton for President.

[Tinker]

Originally posted by heckinglovato

The race is virtually over on the Democratic side, I completely admire Bernie for bringing forth a true leftist agenda and shaking things up towards the left. Truly hoping he files for a Senate run or gets a Cabinet position.

Officially endorsing Secretary Clinton for President.

Aww some Bernsters are coming around <3

[Ramcoro]

Originally posted by heckinglovato

The race is virtually over on the Democratic side, I completely admire Bernie for bringing forth a true leftist agenda and shaking things up towards the left. Truly hoping he files for a Senate run or gets a Cabinet position.

Officially endorsing Secretary Clinton for President.

He's already in the Senate though. Do you mean a high position in the Senate?

[Bloo]

So, I went to a talk by Sam Wang who does election polling and prediction research at Princeton University using statistical models (similar to Nate Silver) and he showed a model that supports a notion that Donald Trump actually benefitted from Kasich winning Ohio. This is due to the notion that Kasich's victory ensures that he will stay in the race (whereas he would have dropped had he not won) and Trump, statistically, would do better when there is more competition to split the vote.

I go to a school that's literally less than ten minutes from Cincinnati, and the entire room moaned because a lot of people voted for Kasich to stop Trump...


EDIT: I can provide the picture of the graphs he provided on this note. The speaker's name is Sam Wang.

[heckinglovato]

Originally posted by Ramcoro

He's already in the Senate though. Do you mean a high position in the Senate?

Referring to 2018.

[Retro]

Thinking of some stuff like this (for both sides) for the OP if I take it or add to it.